Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% | |
| 2 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
| 3 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 5 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 79% |
| 6 | HARRIS Julia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% |
| 7 | HAO Danica | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 52% |
| 8 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | - | 2% | 17% | 47% | 33% | |
| 9 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 10 | SHENG Katherine | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 22% | |
| 11 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 12 | JOO Natalie | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 22% | |
| 13 | FENG Audrey | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 43% | 6% |
| 14 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 19% | |
| 15 | XIE Lillian | - | - | 4% | 26% | 53% | 17% | |
| 16 | LIU Jingyi (Eva) | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 32% | 2% |
| 17 | LI Han (Helina) | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 49% | 18% |
| 18 | WANG Sabrina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
| 19 | LIU Enjia sherry | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
| 20 | WANG Carol | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% |
| 21 | ZOU Ella | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 22 | DONG Angela | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 23 | YACOBUCCI Nadia | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 24 | CAI Ilana | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 1% |
| 25 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 26 | ROBERTS Anastasia | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LIU Caydence | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 28 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 29 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
| 30 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 31 | BING Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 10% |
| 32 | YU Jane | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 33 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 34 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | |
| 34 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% | |
| 36 | SIROTA Francis | - | - | 4% | 17% | 39% | 37% | 4% |
| 37 | SONG Erin | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 38 | LI Joy | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | MARTIN Mila | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 7% |
| 40 | ZHANG Lian | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 41 | WANG Dina C. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 30% | |
| 43 | BERGEL Daphne | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 44 | MCFARLANE Asha | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | WANG Doreen | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 46 | LI Savannah | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 47 | BADLANI Diya | - | 7% | 43% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
| 48 | KRAHE Annika | - | 4% | 33% | 48% | 15% | 1% | |
| 49 | HUANG Sophie | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 14% | 1% | |
| 50 | KIM Claire | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 51 | LIN Yunong | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 52 | JIANG Chloe | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 53 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 54 | KATS Ekaterina | 2% | 22% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | DINAR Julia | 14% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | ARRAIANO Olivia R. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 57 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 58 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 10% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 60 | EYER Brooke | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 60 | DONG Iris | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 8% |
| 62 | BO Iris | 25% | 48% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 63 | DIRKES Catherine | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 2% | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LEE Jeemin | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 66 | BAULIN Zoya | 6% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | WU Maggie Lei | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 68 | TAN Dorathy | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
| 69 | REZA Fukaina | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 70 | SHANG Arianna | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 71 | CAO Kayla | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | - |
| 72 | CHEN Sophie | 1% | 11% | 39% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 73 | WAN Celine | 21% | 51% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 74 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 75 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 76 | YIN Chloe | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 77 | FEDER Acadia | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | ELNAGGAR lily | - | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 79 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 80 | HOROWITZ Shuli | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 81 | GE Lena Lan | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | JI Dora YuanDao | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | SHIN Elizabeth | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 84 | PAN Yiran | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 85 | BRADSHAW Tamira | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | HUANG Natalie | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 87 | GOMEZ Sofia | 21% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 88 | MANGLANI Maya | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 89 | ZHU Ella | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 90 | YOUM Amelia | 26% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 91 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 20% | 44% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 92 | SINGH Evangelina | 39% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 93 | KIM Sophia | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 94 | JANSSEN Juliane | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 95 | PHAN Logan | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 96 | HUNG Samara | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | ZHANG Zoey | 10% | 33% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 99 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 7% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 100 | OCAMPO Emily | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | LEO Jenna | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | LIU Yino | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 103 | CAVANAGH Emma | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 104 | CHOI Cara | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 105 | LEE Abigail | 7% | 40% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | KIM Claire | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 107 | KANG Annabella | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Emily | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 109 | BALIN Sophia | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 110 | WU Annie | 61% | 36% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 110 | LI Christina | 50% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 112 | ZHANG Jaffani | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 113 | VACCARO Lillian | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.