Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Y-14 Men's Saber

Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 4:00 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HUANG Alex F. - - - - 1% 17% 82%
2 KIM Ethan - - - - 4% 32% 64%
3 MATTOO Deven - - 4% 16% 34% 34% 12%
3 ZHAO Lucas - - 1% 8% 25% 41% 26%
5 KIM ELIJAH - - - - 5% 29% 66%
5 LIU Kevin - - - 2% 11% 37% 49%
7 LEE Andrew - - - 3% 18% 44% 35%
8 WANG Daniel - - - 1% 8% 33% 58%
9 CARRINGTON IV William T. - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
9 LI Maxwell - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 28%
11 CHUNG Connor - - - 2% 14% 42% 41%
12 MEHAN Nicholas - - - 1% 10% 36% 53%
13 NARDINI Nathanael P. - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 19%
14 MEYERSON Jacob - - 2% 11% 31% 41% 15%
15 KANG Evan R. - - - 1% 11% 38% 50%
16 KOGAN Yelisey L. - 5% 18% 32% 30% 13% 2%
17 ALAVE Kyle - - 1% 8% 26% 40% 24%
18 GONG zihao - - 3% 17% 41% 39%
19 NG Jonathan - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
20 BIVIJI Ali - 1% 7% 24% 39% 26% 5%
21 VUONG Kyle Ka-Him - 1% 9% 26% 37% 23% 4%
22 GONG ziqian - 1% 7% 21% 34% 27% 9%
23 WANG Max - 1% 5% 17% 33% 33% 13%
24 MEDVINSKY Daniel - - 1% 6% 28% 51% 14%
25 MCDONALD Finn - 1% 8% 26% 40% 23% 2%
26 GUREVICH Benjamin - 1% 8% 24% 36% 24% 6%
27 EPLETT Nicholas 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 1% -
28 URSU Marcel T. - - - 2% 12% 39% 47%
29 OH Aster - - 2% 9% 27% 40% 23%
30 BALE ATMAN - 1% 8% 26% 39% 23% 4%
31 YOOK Isaac - - 1% 9% 29% 42% 18%
32 SUN Andrew 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
33 SRIVATS Vedh - - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
34 PEREIRA Beckham - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 1%
35 DOMINIQUE Remson - - 4% 18% 37% 34% 7%
36 COGLIANO Max 13% 32% 33% 17% 4% 1% -
37 DAI Zihou 1% 7% 22% 34% 27% 9% 1%
38 RINALDI Savio 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9% 1%
39 VALENCIA Jose - 1% 5% 18% 34% 32% 10%
40 ZHANG Ray 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
41 CAI fungyu 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
42 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary - 1% 6% 23% 39% 27% 4%
42 KHANNA Adamantis - - 3% 13% 32% 37% 15%
44 STEVENS Flynn 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
45 YANG Si He - 4% 18% 35% 30% 11% 1%
46 WANG Michael - 2% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
47 PORTER Dupree - 6% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1%
48 LOO Jason - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
49 BAI Evan - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 7%
50 YUEN Caleb 1% 9% 29% 38% 21% 4%
51 SADHU Neiyam - 4% 19% 36% 31% 10% 1%
52 DEELY Hartigan - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
53 SARWAHI Viraat - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% -
54 JI Johnson 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
55 CIEMINS Henry 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
56 LEVIN Jacob 2% 11% 27% 32% 20% 6% 1%
57 WEI William 3% 16% 31% 30% 15% 4% -
58 WANG tiger 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 3% -
59 KOZLOV Lucas - 3% 16% 33% 33% 14% 2%
60 ZHAO Lucas - 6% 23% 38% 27% 6% -
61 MORGAN Abrahm H. - 4% 16% 32% 31% 14% 2%
62 WAXLER Ryan - 4% 17% 34% 32% 13% 1%
63 WONG Ron 9% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1% -
64 SHEYNZON Benjamin 27% 43% 23% 6% 1% - -
65 LUCAS William 1% 12% 31% 34% 18% 4% < 1%
66 CHENG Sawyer - 4% 17% 34% 31% 12% 2%
67 SALDARINI Glenn - - 3% 14% 33% 35% 14%
68 FENG Brendan 2% 15% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
69 HENDERSON Lucas - - 2% 11% 31% 41% 15%
70 MATTOO Dhruv 1% 11% 30% 34% 19% 5% -
71 LIU Ryan 1% 9% 26% 35% 23% 6% -
72 BIVIJI Adam - 7% 27% 38% 22% 5% -
73 BADMUS Joshua 1% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6% 1%
74 MERMEGAS Alexander 1% 6% 19% 32% 29% 13% 2%
74 DE SIENA Salvatore 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% -
76 KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) 1% 10% 28% 35% 21% 5% -
77 WELSTEAD Nicholas - 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 5%
78 CHANG Timothy 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 2% -
79 PERRIN Leo - 5% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
80 HAO Johnny - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
81 HARDRICK Noah 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5% -
82 SLAVNOV Anton 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3% -
83 WANG Matthew 7% 25% 34% 24% 9% 2% -
84 SUH Leo 5% 22% 38% 27% 8% 1% -
85 SUN Stephen 4% 25% 37% 24% 8% 1% -
86 GERTSBERG Eli 6% 23% 34% 25% 10% 2% -
87 LAMTAN Christoffer 2% 14% 30% 32% 18% 4% -
88 OREN Daniel 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
89 TURECK Nathan 6% 24% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
90 BELAND Riley James "RJ" 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
91 WONG Hawken - 6% 24% 37% 25% 7% -
92 BROENING-CHAI Jonas 1% 9% 29% 38% 21% 4%
93 MIAO Heqi 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 2%
94 FIROOZI Sam 57% 34% 8% 1% - -
95 TRZEPLA Max 1% 9% 28% 38% 20% 3% -
96 HU Jayden 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 2%
97 VOHRA Ekam 10% 31% 35% 18% 5% - -
98 ZHAO Royce - 4% 16% 32% 32% 14% 2%
99 SONG Aidan 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 2% -
100 CHAN Ewan 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
100 LIU Jayden 1% 21% 39% 28% 9% 1% -
102 LI Coby 1% 6% 22% 34% 26% 10% 1%
103 SHINCHUK Jacob 15% 34% 32% 15% 4% - -
103 LEMERY Marc 12% 39% 34% 12% 2% - -
105 TAYCHER Aaron - 9% 29% 37% 20% 4% -
106 GAO Kai 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
107 KENNEDY Tomás 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1% -
108 REILLY Xavier 16% 42% 32% 9% 1% - -
109 KAMURA Kosei 3% 15% 32% 32% 15% 3% -
110 KU Alexander 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
111 BRADIC Andreja 56% 35% 8% 1% - - -
112 HE Zhikai (kyle) 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
113 LIN Brendan - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
114 LIEBOWITZ Carson 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
115 AGARWAAL Yohan - 4% 16% 30% 31% 15% 3%
116 ZWAKA Jonas 32% 41% 21% 5% 1% - -
117 WU Vincent 3% 15% 31% 31% 16% 4% -
118 BARENBOYM Michael 5% 21% 34% 27% 11% 2% -
118 ONUGHA II Emeka - 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
120 HAUSLER Jayden 19% 39% 30% 10% 2% - -
120 STEWART Samuel 17% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
122 LAU Kyrus 7% 25% 34% 23% 8% 2% -
123 LIU Eric 5% 20% 33% 27% 12% 3% -
124 GORDON Samuel 11% 32% 34% 18% 4% 1% -
125 TAKEBE Ren - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
126 GRABOWSKI Alexander 2% 12% 31% 34% 17% 3% -
127 TITOV Zachary 2% 14% 33% 33% 16% 3% -
128 KHOTLINE Daniel 4% 19% 33% 28% 13% 3% -
129 SAYAR Luke 3% 23% 39% 26% 7% 1%
130 WONG Mac 9% 33% 36% 18% 4% - -
131 LEE Damian 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
132 DOSTAL Maximilian 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 4% -
133 WONG Max 2% 14% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
134 KARAVAS Nicholas 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1% -
135 AVERY Marcus 8% 36% 37% 16% 3% - -
136 GRABOWSKI Stanley 20% 43% 28% 8% 1% - -
137 JIA Charles 42% 41% 14% 2% - - -
138 FOUX Jonathan 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% - -
139 D'AMELJ Edoardo 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
139 PAI Ayan 13% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
139 BROOKS Drake 3% 19% 35% 30% 11% 2% -
142 FREILICH Harrison 45% 41% 13% 2% - - -
143 CHEN Vince 82% 16% 1% - - - -
143 SAUVE Quinn 55% 35% 9% 1% - - -
145 TUNIK Joshuah 31% 41% 22% 6% 1% - -
146 BUCKLEY Owen 5% 20% 34% 27% 11% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.