Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
1 | DAMBAL Sasha | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 27% | ||||||
2 | BUSH Bethany | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% | ||||||
3 | TA-ZHOU Emma | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | ||||||
3 | AWAD Royce | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 9% | ||||||
5 | LEOU Korina | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | ||||||
6 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% | ||||||
7 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% | ||||||
8 | KWON Ava | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |||||||
9 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% | ||||||
10 | LI Sonia | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | ||||||
11 | MALEK Zolie | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | ||||||
12 | XU Elaine | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% | ||||||
13 | CROOKS Riley | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | ||||||
14 | SEVASTOPULO Sahra | 2% | 14% | 31% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - | ||||||
15 | YE Isabella | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | ||||||
16 | BERRIOS Catalina | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |||||||
17 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | ||||||
18 | BORGUETA Madison | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | ||||||
19 | GONZALEZ Veronika | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |||||||
20 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 14% | |||||||
21 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 27% | ||||||
22 | LEE Alyson | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | ||||||
23 | MACKAY Katherine | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |||||||
24 | ZHU Elaine | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% | ||||||
25 | MYAT Chloe | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% | ||||||
25 | FUNG Iris | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | ||||||
27 | BROWN Aria | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% | ||||||
28 | MERMEGAS Olivia | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | ||||||
29 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |||||||
30 | KWON Ava | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |||||||
31 | YAN Angela | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
32 | LIU Chelsea | 25% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
33 | HU Anna | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | ||||||
34 | VINOKUR Anita | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | ||||||
35 | WANG JiaQi | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% | ||||||
36 | SHEN Emily | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | ||||||
37 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | ||||||
38 | CHOI Charlotte | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |||||||
38 | NADKARNI Marisa | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |||||||
40 | KIM Audrey | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |||||||
41 | SHMULER Fiona | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |||||||
42 | REN Katherine | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |||||||
43 | WANG Emily | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |||||||
44 | LEIGH Adalene | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |||||||
45 | CHANG Norah | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
46 | ZHU Avril | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | ||||||
47 | IANNUZZI Lucy | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
48 | MAO Elsa | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% | ||||||
49 | NIU Jessica | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | ||||||
50 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |||||||
51 | GONG Joy | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 34% | 10% | ||||||
52 | BAIK Sarah | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% | ||||||
53 | WONG Charlene | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | ||||||
54 | DHAR Rana | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | ||||||
55 | FABRICANT Kioka R. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
56 | GUHA Surabhi | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
57 | MANSPERGER Gia | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% | ||||||
58 | MAO anna | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - | ||||||
59 | SEO Kaitlyn | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |||||||
60 | ZONG Eliane | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |||||||
61 | RIFKIN Lielle | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |||||||
62 | DUTA Lyra | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | ||||||
63 | PARK Haylie | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - | ||||||
64 | HILD Anya | 2% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | ||||||
65 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | ||||||
66 | ILAGAN Ava | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | ||||||
67 | MAK Kaitlin | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | ||||||
68 | LIANG Claire | - | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
69 | REDA Sophie | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% | ||||||
70 | NANDA Maanika | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | ||||||
71 | LEE Kaitlin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% | ||||||
72 | LAFFY Lily | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | ||||||
73 | MAK Jayden | 6% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - | ||||||
74 | STEDMAN Sienna | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - | ||||||
75 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 1% | 9% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |||||||
76 | STEVENS Ashelin | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |||||||
77 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 28% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |||||||
78 | HARVEY-LEE Luisa | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |||||||
79 | WANG MONA | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - | ||||||
80 | ENG Madeleine | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | ||||||
81 | SMITH Genevieve | 50% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - | ||||||
82 | SHI Chuqing | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% | ||||||
83 | NG Sophia | 11% | 54% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
84 | YOON Sela | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% | ||||||
85 | FONG Abigail | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
86 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | ||||||
87 | NAKATA Gwyneth | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - | ||||||
88 | VATSA Shradha | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - | ||||||
89 | BHARDWAJ Riya | 10% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |||||||
90 | BIBLER Anna | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |||||||
91 | KONZEN Iris | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |||||||
92 | GOLEN Grace | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |||||||
93 | TAKEUCHI Isabel | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - | ||||||
94 | MERZLYAKOVA Maria | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | ||||||
95 | LI Tiffany | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | ||||||
96 | PARKER Mrinali | - | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | ||||||
97 | HUANG Zoe | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - | ||||||
98 | PALEY Alisa | 11% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
99 | KESSLER Amelia | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - | ||||||
99 | KIM Eunjae | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | ||||||
101 | WANG Selina | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - | ||||||
102 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - | ||||||
103 | VATS Ishita | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |||||||
104 | WANG Keira | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |||||||
105 | KIM Grace | 100% | ||||||||||||
105 | KIM Grace | 1% | 5% | 14% | 24% | 25% | 18% | 9% | 3% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
107 | HO Sophia | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | ||||||
108 | BEHNKE Abigail | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |||||||
108 | ALFONSO-VALLEJO Cecilia | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |||||||
110 | ARCHER Devin | 1% | 17% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | ||||||
111 | MERZLYAKOVA Alexandra | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - | ||||||
112 | WILFRET Katerina | 30% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - | ||||||
113 | CHI Alicia | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - | ||||||
114 | BUCCINO Sloane | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.