Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% |
2 | NIXON Catherine (Kasia) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
3 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
3 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 3% |
5 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
6 | GUZZI VINCENTI Margherita A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
7 | GRADY Miriam A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
8 | CEBULA Anne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
9 | TOBY Natalia R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
10 | BASSA Francesca A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
11 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
12 | HOLMES Katharine (Kat) W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
13 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
14 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
15 | YAMANAKA Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | |
16 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
17 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
18 | CHU Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
19 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
20 | SHEFFIELD Lake Mawu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 36% |
21 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 10% |
22 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
23 | NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 28% |
24 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
25 | RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 9% |
26 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
27 | WASHINGTON Isis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | |
28 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% | 1% | |
29 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
30 | LEE Michelle J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% | 7% |
31 | YANG Alisa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
32 | FENG Ge | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
33 | WU Fan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% |
34 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoria | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | 1% |
35 | LIU Charlene (Kai) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
36 | LURYE Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 12% |
37 | MILEWSKI Nicole | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
38 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
39 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
40 | SOBUS Yanka | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
41 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
42 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
43 | WANG Zoe | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 3% |
45 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
46 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
47 | KETKAR Ketki | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
48 | KOMAR Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
49 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 3% | |
50 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
51 | KORFONTA Jolie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
52 | HAMILTON Pauline S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 3% |
53 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
54 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
55 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
56 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
56 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
59 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
60 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - |
61 | CANNING Charlotte | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
62 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
63 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
64 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
65 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | - |
65 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
67 | WATRALL Christina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 33% | |
68 | WONG Alexandra R. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
69 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 4% | - |
70 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
71 | WELLS Tesla M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
72 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 7% |
73 | CHEN Lefu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | 2% |
74 | SHU Youshan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
75 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
76 | NEMETH Katherine | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
77 | BARG Daniella | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | 1% | |
78 | KHARCHYNA Polina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
79 | LEE Claire | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | |
80 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 16% | |
81 | QI Jarynne Valerie | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
82 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
83 | EDWARDS Auprell | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
84 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
85 | IYER Ishana | 100% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
85 | CAMPBELL Eva | 100% | 83% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
87 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
88 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
89 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
90 | MUN Brianna K. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
91 | KALE Anika A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
92 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
93 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
94 | NIX Reagan | 100% | 67% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
95 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 14% | |
96 | AZMEH nour | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
97 | DORVAL Anne-Marie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
98 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
99 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
100 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 4% |
101 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
102 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
103 | SONG Angela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
104 | GAO Judy | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
105 | LEE Yejine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
105 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
105 | LI Fei | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
108 | KUMAR Anusha | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
109 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
110 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 100% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
111 | LIN Victoria T. | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
112 | SUN MANRONG | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
113 | PRESMAN Aerin | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
114 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
115 | LU Samantha R. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
116 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
117 | MISHIMA Audrey | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
118 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
119 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
120 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
121 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
121 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - | |
123 | BEAVER Ava | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
124 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
125 | GUJJA Misha | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
126 | YOU Emily | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
127 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
128 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
129 | PECK Maia A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
130 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
131 | QIU Emily | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
132 | ANDERSON Claire | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
132 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
134 | MCSWEENEY Janie | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
135 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
136 | CHANG Chloe | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
137 | XIAO Nancy | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
138 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 80% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
139 | CAMPBELL Anahit M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
140 | KORKIN Alice | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
141 | PEELER Julia | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
142 | SEMIKIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 20% | 1% |
142 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
144 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
145 | REKEDA Anna | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
146 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 67% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
146 | NAKA Emily | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
148 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
149 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
150 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
151 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
152 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
153 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
154 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
155 | PATIL Amulya | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.