The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | 1% | 6% | 28% | 47% | 18% | |
2 | AIRES Julia | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 10% | |
3 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
3 | BURICEA Ada | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
5 | DUONG Zoey | - | 1% | 15% | 39% | 35% | 9% | |
5 | LAI Amanda | - | 4% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
7 | LIN Isabel | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
8 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
9 | SCANLAN Claire | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
10 | YIN Gabriela | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
11 | LIANG Jingjing | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 41% |
12 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
13 | DALEY Keira | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% | |
14 | COHEN Shaina | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
15 | CHANG Abigail | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
16 | LEE Valerie | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
17 | BROWN Riley | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
18 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
19 | BHATT Anisha | - | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
20 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% | |
21 | BROCKMANN Brooke | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 5% | |
22 | POON Desiree | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 3% | |
23 | DAYAL Saahira | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
24 | YUNG Bethany | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
25 | CHA Eugenie | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 25% | |
26 | BLANCO Ariia | 2% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | LEE Emily | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | 1% | |
28 | SIMHADRI Sanjana | 15% | 51% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
29 | PATTERSON Liliya | 15% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
30 | KAUR Jaap | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
31 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | CHIOU-WILLIAMS Matea | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
33 | HAU Olivia | - | 5% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
34 | ZHANG Helen | 14% | 55% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
35 | BUCA Nora | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
36 | SCANLAN Alina Nev | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | |
37 | MENG Fina | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
38 | MOLLINIER Angel | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
39 | JAMES Ashley | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
40 | MADANNAVAR Trisha | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
41 | JAIN Aashi | 61% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
41 | PADHI Nisha | 69% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | |
43 | JAIN Prisha | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
44 | LEE Emma | 29% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.