The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 86% | |
2 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
3 | DIECK Miranda P. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
3 | TAN Adelyn | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
5 | GOSAVI Aabolee | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
6 | CONG Anne | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
7 | YU Stella | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
8 | GAY Sasha | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 1% | |
9 | TONG Laurie | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | - | |
10 | RAGHURAMAN Anishka | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
11 | JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
12 | YAO mucen | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
13 | WANG Jiayi | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | - | |
14 | ZHAI AMY | - | 9% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 2% | |
15 | HUSS Miriam | 2% | 12% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
16 | KIM Satie | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
17 | BAERENWALD Welles | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
18 | VENNELA Dhatri | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
19 | OCA Merci | 8% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
20 | WONG Cerise | 8% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
21 | WU Chloe | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
22 | ROBBINS Adele | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
23 | SAWANT Asmi | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
24 | AKULOVA Eva | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
25 | ASPIRAS Avery | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.