University of Houston - Campus Recreation and Wellness Center - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GRIFFIN John O. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% |
| 2 | LEWIS Paul D. | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
| 3 | RUFFNER Blake W. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 3 | PARK Sky | 4% | 33% | 45% | 17% | 1% | |
| 5 | ACUNA Gabriel G. | - | - | 2% | 20% | 47% | 31% |
| 6 | REYES Omar | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% |
| 7 | LONG Quinton R. | - | - | 16% | 44% | 34% | 5% |
| 8 | THAYER Jake T. | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% | |
| 9 | ELKOUSY Laith H. | - | 1% | 32% | 46% | 20% | 2% |
| 10 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | - | - | 9% | 40% | 39% | 11% |
| 11 | MARÍN MANRÍQUEZ Ángel Fernando | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 12 | MURRAY Maximo | - | - | 4% | 28% | 46% | 22% |
| 13 | JOHNSON Chance | 1% | 13% | 46% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 14 | GALLIGAN Michael J. | - | 1% | 19% | 49% | 29% | 2% |
| 15 | KIM Brian | - | 7% | 35% | 45% | 12% | - |
| 16 | QUINONES Diego A. | - | 10% | 38% | 44% | 8% | |
| 17 | CLARK Benjamin | 9% | 53% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 18 | ANDRIC Borna | 4% | 35% | 44% | 15% | 1% | |
| 19 | EXNICIOS Richard M. | 13% | 64% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | CONVERSE Warren D. | - | 13% | 55% | 27% | 4% | - |
| 21 | JONES Sam J. | 1% | 35% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | JAUME Andrei | - | < 1% | 6% | 33% | 55% | 6% |
| 23 | FINLEY Dylan | - | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | CHENG Mason | 52% | 46% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | DAI Christopher | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
| 26 | EXNICIOS Rex | 44% | 54% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 27 | CARROLL Robert | 77% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 28 | ANDERSON Donald | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 28 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.