The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 2 | WANG Tiger | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 3 | CHAN Henry | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 3 | GAY Jono | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 5 | HRISTOV Kris | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 5 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
| 7 | LI AYDEN | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 8 | LI Seth | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
| 9 | NGO Maximus | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 10 | IYER Neil | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 11 | HOLZ Lucas | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 12 | HO Anson | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 13 | ROSS Dash S. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 14 | VO Landon | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | WONG Lucas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 16 | CHOI Benjamin | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | KANG Matthew | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 18 | LISKOVETS Alec | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | HENRY Ethan | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 20 | SINGHAL Armaan | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | TAN Ryan | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 22 | RAO Adrit | - | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | GONZALEZ Mark | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 24 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 1% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | ASPIRAS Piers | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 26 | GRAEHL Ian | 6% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.