Fencing Academy of Denver - Littleton, CO, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Ezra | V V V | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 2 | OLESKY Ellie | V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 3 | DUDNICK Caitlin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | CRANDALL Caleb | D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 5 | CHEN Zhengyang | V D V V | V | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 6 | ROMAN Clarissa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | SCHAMBERGER Amelia | D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 8 | THOMAS Riley Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | CAMPBELL Torin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | ROHRBACH Flynn | V V V | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 11 | BOURASSA James Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | IVERSON Niels | V D D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 | |
| 13 | MERRITT Annabelle | V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 14 | MUSSON Miles | D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 15 | BURINK Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | WOLLOW Bennett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | LENGERICH Hudson Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | ANDRUS-LUNDY James | D D D D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 | |
| 19 | AMARAL Caleb Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | KLOBETANZ W. Maddox Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | COOPER Nate Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.