Grand Rapids Fencing Academy - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KUE Temujin | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% | |
2 | YEE Michael | - | 3% | 27% | 56% | 14% | |
3 | SALINAS Jessica L. | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
3 | HEYBOER Jason | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
5 | HARRISON Gabriel | 4% | 32% | 44% | 18% | 2% | |
6 | KNIBBE Nathan | - | 7% | 30% | 45% | 18% | |
7 | LAWRENCE Owen | 5% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - |
8 | WILLIAMS Christopher R. | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
9 | EDWARDS Connor | 3% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
10 | POGOSIAN Roman | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
11 | NI Aaric | 7% | 36% | 41% | 15% | 1% | |
12 | GENNARO Juliana | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
13 | WALTERS Elias | 74% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
14 | HAN Ethan | 2% | 28% | 45% | 22% | 3% | |
15 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 5% | 30% | 45% | 19% | 1% | |
16 | TERPSTRA Clive | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.