John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
2 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 1% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
3 | KUMAR Anusha | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | |
3 | CAMPBELL Eva | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
5 | DUNSEATH Lauren M. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% |
6 | LORENTSON Dawn M. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
7 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
8 | PULLEN Ayah | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
9 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
10 | DONGES Anna | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
11 | SANDERS Charlotte | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
12 | BOWIE Charlotta | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
13 | FAN Elizabeth | 2% | 20% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
14 | BYRON Karen J. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
15 | MIHILL Margaret | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
16 | NIEMAN Aubrey | 24% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% |
18 | PELLI Madeleine | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
19 | RAFFERTY Catherine | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
20 | HE Lizbeth | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
20 | NOH Rachel | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
22 | ROWLAND May | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | |
23 | WALTER Anna | 6% | 36% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
24 | RHEINECKER Eleanora Grace | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | BOTNER Olivia | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
26 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
27 | RHEINECKER Claire | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | |
28 | JULIEN Erica | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
29 | DEBLAERE Caecie M. | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.