John T. Rhodes Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAM Alan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 2 | GLENNON Sebastian J. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 3 | RACHEL Dylan | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 3 | RUSSELL James | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 40% | 12% | |
| 5 | MEGGERS Davin | - | - | 3% | 23% | 46% | 28% | |
| 6 | CLICK Tristan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
| 7 | SINGH Ravin | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 19% | |
| 8 | CORBIN Bennett | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 9 | HULL Liam | - | - | 4% | 27% | 46% | 22% | |
| 10 | BOUDREAUX James | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% | |
| 11 | CARNALL Hunter | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 12 | RAVI Arjun | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 13 | ROCKWELL Nolan | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | CHUNG Andrew | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 15 | KIM Joshua | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 16 | ZHU Aaron | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 17 | PETROW Zoryan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 18 | LIN Kason | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% | |
| 19 | SNYDER Ari | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 10% | |
| 20 | DAN Rex | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 21 | CHUNG Joseph | 1% | 30% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | CHA Patrick | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 23 | MODULLA Yathin R. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 24 | ZHANG Lucas | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | PAL Ian K. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | HAN Sam | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 27 | HE Yurui | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 28 | YANG Gary | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 29 | MARKOWITZ Sam | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | YI Nathan | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | DINKINS Adam | - | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | REDDY Daksh | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | JONES Jackson | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BETTS Kieran | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | AUSBAND Zaine | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 37 | ROBERTS Phoenix | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | FARRER Brennecke E | 23% | 50% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 39 | SUNKARA Vishnu | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | DELONG Joshua | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | WATERS Nathaniel | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | JIANG Harry | 4% | 28% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | CHAN Ryan | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.