Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DUNGEY Amelia S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 2 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 8% |
| 3 | LIMB Madeline I. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | BURCH Makana Y. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 5 | YUCEL Emine I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 6 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% |
| 7 | PETTIT Sara M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 8 | IYER Mohini R. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 10 | KUDRIAVTSEVA Daria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% |
| 11 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 12 | VALADEZ Emily T. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | |
| 13 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 87% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | BAWA Sanya | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 15 | MILLER Mattea K. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | WU Zoe | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 17 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 18 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 19 | TIBURCIO Diana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 11% | |
| 20 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 21 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
| 22 | WEINBERG Alexandra L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
| 23 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 9% | |
| 24 | MERRIAM Katherine I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | DODRILL Brooke | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 26 | KIM Allison E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 27 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 2% |
| 28 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 29 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 31 | DESAI Maya D. | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | ROBINSON Stella | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
| 33 | WOLFSON Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 35 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% | |
| 36 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | STOODLEY Theresa R. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 40 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 41 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CANNON Sophia E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 43 | PRAXL Alexa R. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 43 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 45 | PETE Gillian C. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
| 47 | OWENS Celine A. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 48 | BEATY Carlee | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
| 49 | KIM Nam Heui | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | MATAIEV Natalie S. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | PIACENTINI Ava (Ava J) J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | D'ORAZIO Isabella | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | BAE EMMELINE | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | |
| 55 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 56 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | LIN Zhiyin | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | VANCE Beth S. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 59 | ZENG Xiaoyi | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | KITTLE Lauren | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | WHEELER Kira | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 63 | FORD Sofia | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | PONIATOWSKI Elise | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | RANGANATHAN Ruchi | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.