Owings Mills, MD - Owings Mills, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
2 | PAN Andrew W. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
3 | KENNEDY Liam A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 16% |
3 | PARK Collin D. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
5 | LEONARD Cole | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
6 | CHIN Matthew W. | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
7 | CHANG Eliot A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
8 | HUANG Ethan F. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
9 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 7% |
10 | MADDALONE Thomas | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
11 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 19% | |
12 | ZHOU Brian | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
13 | REN Richard | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
14 | DELARUE NELSON Y. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
15 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
16 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
17 | ZHOU Kevin | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
18 | COX Luis E. | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
19 | LU Caleb Q. | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
20 | FORT David | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.