Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LAI Boden | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | FENG Shang | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 3 | AHMED Mohsen | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 5 | SINGLETON Aman | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | SONG Changze | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 7 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | D V V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | PAN Anthony | V V D D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 9 | WHITE Jackson | V D V V V D | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 10 | LIU Ethan | V D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 11 | ALEXANDER Christopher | V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 12 | OCONNOR Paul | D V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 13 | MORI Seneca | D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 14 | TESFAYE Elias | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | D D V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 16 | ZHANG Jonathan | V D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | CAFASSO Alexander | D V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 17 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | V V V D D V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 19 | WITHERELL Logan | D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 20 | WANG-SONG Evan | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | HELMY Richard | D D V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 22 | BO Genero | D V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | SONG Aidan | V V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 24 | SZCZAPA Lukas | V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 25 | HAN Keyi | D D V V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 26 | ARMSTRONG Payson | V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | ROBINSON Garrett | D D V D D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 28 | GU Eric | V V D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 29 | WU Matthew | V D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 30 | GLUSHKOV David | D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 31 | FOGEL Jake | D D V D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 32 | HANNA Alexander | D D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 33 | LEE Harrison | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 34 | CHEN Daniel | V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 35 | ZHAI Christopher | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 36 | WANG Marcus | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | MCGANN Grant | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 38 | SHI Evan | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.