San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUNDBORG Mark R. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
2 | RUNYAN Joshua | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
3 | MATT Chris | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
3 | HERRERA Richard K. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
5 | MILNE Will J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 49% | 10% |
6 | BUKOWSKI Todd | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
7 | DASHNAW Stephen | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
8 | LEAR Donald W. | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 44% | 16% | 1% |
9 | ZINNI Gene | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
10 | SRERE Mark A. | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
11 | GUEBLE Jeffrey R. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
12 | LIN Feng | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
13 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
14 | SU Ji | 13% | 58% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
15 | KRASNICH Mike | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
16 | ANTHONY Jr Donald K. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
17 | HECK Steven D. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 34% | 8% |
18 | DAHL Chris | 19% | 51% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
19 | CRETEN joachim | 2% | 17% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
20 | MIGHELL Jason | - | 11% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
21 | HICHA Paul R. | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 28% | 5% | - |
22 | TREANOR Donald K. | 19% | 55% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
23 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
24 | BLAIR III Ray H. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
25 | RICHARDS Dick | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
26 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 74% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
27 | OLSON Mark R. | 50% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.