San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 2 | KALKINA Yelena | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | DEMING Clare L. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 11% |
| 3 | WILLEMSE Jamie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 5 | FOLEY Eileen | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 6 | ALTMAN Leigh | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 7 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
| 8 | PIERRYNOWSKI Kathryn S. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 9 | ENOCHS Liz | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 10 | KIM Nam Heui | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 11 | RUNYAN Heidi | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% |
| 12 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 47% | 15% |
| 13 | FREYRE Rebecca R. | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | DUDNICK Shannon | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | SIERRA Kate | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 16 | KONG Zhao xia | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | YANG Jenny J. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | VANCE Beth S. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 19 | LIM Nona | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 20 | STARKS-FAULKNER Jennette | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 21 | GORDON Sharon | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 22 | STARR Cynthia (Cindy) H. | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 23 | DUONG Esther | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 24 | CAISSE Michelle | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | DAHL Naomi V. | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 26 | KING Robin E. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 3% | 29% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | OISHI Yoko | 4% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DUNN Linda J. J. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 5% |
| 30 | GLUCK Myriam | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | FEITLER Sarah | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | SCHLIENGER Katia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | OSTRIKOFF Michelle | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | IIZUKA Sawako | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | CHANCO-EVERETT Aileen | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | MASLEN Cheryl L. | 23% | 48% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | DEGEN Anita L. | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | PEIN Annette | 19% | 42% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | HAN Alisa | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MANNINO Anna (Annie) C. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 41 | CHRISS Rhonda | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.