San Jose McEnery Convention Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 72% | |
2 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
3 | SULLIVAN Siobhan R. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% |
3 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
5 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% | |
6 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
7 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
8 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
9 | LEE Alexandra B. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 55% |
10 | LEE Hannah | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% | |
11 | FOUR-GARCIA Madison | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 54% | ||
12 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
13 | FESTA Carina | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
14 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
15 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 47% | 14% |
16 | TONG Kunling | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
17 | LIU Sophie | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
18 | PAUL Lila | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 20% | |
19 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
20 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 10% |
21 | SHI Cathleen | - | 1% | 5% | 25% | 49% | 20% | |
22 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 1% | 7% | 31% | 47% | 15% | ||
23 | FEARNS Zara A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 13% |
24 | KER Grace | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
25 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 45% | 8% | |
26 | FEIG Sela | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
27 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
28 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
29 | GALYEMSKA Viktoriya | 1% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
30 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 5% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 5% |
31 | CHANG Josephine S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
32 | HUAI Delilah | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
33 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 26% |
33 | WU Helen | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
35 | LIN Nicole | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | < 1% | |
36 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 51% | 12% |
37 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 14% |
38 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
39 | HILD Nisha | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
40 | BUHAY Rachel T. | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
41 | GRULICH Rayaana | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
42 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
43 | CHEN Ashley | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 51% | 10% | |
44 | ENGELMAN-SANZ Madeline A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
45 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
46 | DUCKETT Madison | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
47 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
48 | KHAN Alissa | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
49 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
50 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
51 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
52 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% | |
53 | TSE Angelina | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
54 | MUND Ruth | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
55 | JUNG Irene | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
56 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - |
57 | SHI Julia | 9% | 34% | 41% | 14% | 1% | ||
58 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
59 | TZOU Alexandra | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% | |
60 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
61 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 1% | 24% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | |
62 | LI Alexis | 6% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 3% | - | |
63 | HUANG MADELINE | - | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
64 | XU Emily T. | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
65 | LAURI Keira | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | < 1% |
66 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
67 | SENOGLU Irmak | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
68 | XIAO julie | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% |
69 | LU Amy | - | 1% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | |
70 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
71 | CHIN Erika J. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 42% | 47% | |
72 | TSUI Natalie | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
73 | YU Holly | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - |
74 | HU Michelle | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
75 | CHAVAN Arya | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
76 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
77 | GUVEN Coco | - | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
78 | JEONG Katie | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
79 | YANG Angelina LeLe | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
80 | DANTULURI Shalini | 1% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
81 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 10% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - |
82 | MAKLIN Sofia | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
83 | YAO Rainie | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 8% | - | |
84 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% | |
85 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 23% | |
86 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 27% | 3% | |
87 | LU Elaine | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
88 | DIECK Miranda P. | 17% | 44% | 32% | 7% | - | - | |
89 | LIGH Erenei J. | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
90 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
91 | ZHANG Chenfei | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
92 | LEE Sophia | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
92 | FANG Victoria W. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
94 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
95 | MARYASH Samantha | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
96 | ATTIA Jasmine | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
97 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 1% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
98 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
99 | HENRY Soraya S. | 1% | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
100 | STONE Hava S. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
101 | STONE Coral | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
102 | GAUTAM Sahana | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
103 | MANKOVA Varvara | 11% | 40% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
104 | LIU Sydney | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
105 | CHIANG Melissa | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
106 | XI Shining | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
107 | LO Chloe | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
108 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - |
109 | DUDNICK Morgan | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
110 | MUNGUIA Mila | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
111 | LIU Zhi Jun | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
112 | HAN Emma | 18% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
113 | XIONG Haojiao | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
114 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 8% | 36% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
115 | TAN Adelyn | 23% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | ||
116 | TONG Jessie | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
117 | SCOTT Eve | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
118 | TEYSSIER Katherine | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
119 | YANG Lea | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
120 | BUSH Bethany | 3% | 43% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
121 | MANN Sophia J. | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
122 | LIM Jaslene | - | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
123 | TUNG Renee | - | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
124 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
125 | DAI Olivia | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
125 | ONG Lauren | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
127 | YEN Natalie | 16% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
128 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
129 | YOUNG Audrey | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
129 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 18% | 54% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
131 | FENG Alicia G. | 1% | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
132 | MANI Francesca B. | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
133 | JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) | 36% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
134 | DONG Angel | 26% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | ||
135 | NAIR Supriya | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
136 | WANG Gloria Ruoyan | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | - | |
137 | LEE Lauren | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
137 | OLKO Sophie | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
139 | YUAN Vienna | 17% | 48% | 31% | 4% | - | - | |
140 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
140 | BARBOSA Katia | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
142 | BAINS Nandini | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
143 | VENNELA Dhatri | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
144 | WU Chloe | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
145 | WANG Peijia | 34% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
146 | BAIRD Kaleah | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
146 | SULLIVAN Siobhan | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
146 | SNOAD Indy | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
146 | LIANG Cera | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
150 | SOUTTER Sandra | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | - | - |
151 | BANGALORE Shriya | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.