Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | GOLDIN Nina | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
2 | ASHTIANI Shaya | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
3 | MARENTES Blanca E. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
3 | ABRAHAMS Tameem | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
5 | JAKSTAS Kalnius | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
6 | NADEL Joshua | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
7 | MOODY Paul J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
8 | ZUG Kiersten A. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 2% |
9 | HONG Hunter | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
10 | HOLMES Sabrina | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
11 | PEI Anthony | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
12 | LOPER Alex | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
13 | NAIR Supriya | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
14 | NEARMAN Christopher | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
15 | RAMAN Indira | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | MA Yanjie | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
17 | VALENTINE Rhys | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
18 | DEGEN Anita L. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
18 | HOGUE Spencer | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
20 | WHITE Bob | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
21 | WEST Mia | 5% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
22 | WONG Alice | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
23 | PENG Gregory | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
24 | HOGUE Dillon | 29% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
25 | BRUCE Anthony | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
26 | CHAUDHURI Urvashi | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
27 | OTTERSTROM Bjorn | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.