Phoenix, AZ - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
| 1 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 14% |
| 2 | SHEARER Natalie E. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% |
| 3 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 5 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 6 | JAVERI Amaya | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% |
| 7 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 1% | 13% | 38% | 36% | 11% |
| 8 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 9 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 22% |
| 10 | GOMES Diana C. | 20% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 11 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% |
| 13 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% |
| 14 | JEAN Olympe G. | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | TREACY Aisling | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.