Treasure Island YMCA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 60% | 12% |
2 | HSU Emily | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 51% | 26% |
3 | THERON Zoe | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 30% |
3 | LIU Ariana | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 19% |
5 | MA Isabelle | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
6 | YU Sophie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
7 | SAH Madeleine | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
8 | LUO Miranda | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 43% | 44% |
9 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 40% | 9% |
10 | CHO Karis | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
11 | XIA Isabella | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 36% | 6% | |
12 | HOM Avery | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 39% | 15% |
13 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
14 | CHAN Ella | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 34% | 4% |
15 | HSIAO Ariya | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
16 | LI Sophia | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
17 | HSU Rachel | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
18 | ARYA Leela | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
19 | LEE Abigail | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
20 | THOTA Akira | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
21 | SHEN Gloria | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
22 | AHN Hayley | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
23 | HOM Emma | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
24 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% | |
25 | HO Chloe | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
26 | JOESUF Thea | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
27 | LI Audrey | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | YU-TAN Claire | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
29 | CHEN Elysia | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
31 | ZALTZMAN Maya | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
32 | TEWARI Amaira | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
33 | ZHAN Catherine | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
34 | DVOIRIS Maya | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
35 | TANG Amelia | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
36 | LIN Avery | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
37 | KO Adeline | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
38 | YANG Byanca | 14% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
39 | JEANSON Sierra | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
40 | TIAN Claire | 4% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
41 | CHU Lauren | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
42 | MAHAPATRA Alisha | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
43 | ZHANG Elizabeth | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
44 | JOESUF Aurielle | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
45 | WANG Ellen | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
46 | KIM Audrey | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
47 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
48 | STERNAD Pia | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
49 | KHAIRUL ANWAR Rania Yasmin | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
50 | CHENG Audrey | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | |
51 | LEE Adelaide | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
52 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
53 | LIU Mia | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
54 | THERIOT Reagan | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
55 | ANSARI Sara | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
56 | YU Xintong | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | GUO Jianing | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | HONDA Emi | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
59 | PARK Seojeong | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
60 | IRELAND Moira | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
61 | ERDMAN-SINESIO Sophia | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
62 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
63 | PARK Gian | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
64 | PAN Samantha | < 1% | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
65 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
66 | LIU Madeleine | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
67 | Q Mia | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
68 | RAJESH Amulya | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.