Marian Central Catholic High School - Woodstock, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ALDORT Amanda | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | SORG Arianna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | TOMPSON Lu Li Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | PARK Jiwon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 5 | RAFFERTY Meaghan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | PALLA Sai Jasmitha Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | SISSAC Samya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | HASS Charlotte Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | VOLK Joe Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | MALVESTUTO Prudence | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | POULAKIDAS Maria | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | REESE Lauren Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | MCGRUDER Brazil Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | BISHT Chestha Singh Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | SUN Grace Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | CUNNINGHAM Mary Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | ROSS Piper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | BASRA Nina Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | CRUZ-GARBO Milena Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | FEINBERG Devan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | CHOWDHARY Saisha Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | OBOZA Catherine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | RAMESH Kaviya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | BABOLEA Alexis Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | KATZ Madeline Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | DHAWAN Anushkka Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | AVINA paloma Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | KYUNG Lucy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | WILLIAMS Anjeli Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | ADEYEMI Ikeoluwa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | LEE Yejin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | ZHAO Fiona Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | PATEL Krishna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | ARREOLA Josephine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.