Culver Academies - Culver, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 99% | 74% | 24% | ||
| 2 | HONE Katarina G. | 100% | 63% | ||||
| 3 | MYERS Chloe A. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 21% | ||
| 3 | BAE Emmeline | 100% | 58% | 13% | |||
| 5 | BAWA Sanya | 100% | 98% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 6 | LAUREANO Emily | 100% | 80% | 30% | |||
| 7 | WELLES Gillian | 100% | 82% | 32% | |||
| 8 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
| 9 | KARPOOR Shreya Missing ID | ||||||
| 10 | HAN Lisa Missing ID | ||||||
| 11 | CHEN Fangping(Martha) | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 12 | BURUKHINA Alexandra | 100% | 79% | 30% | 4% | ||
| 13 | MICHI Sophie | 100% | 37% | ||||
| 14 | GRZESIAK Brianna Missing ID | ||||||
| 15 | BATRA Simran | 100% | 52% | 8% | - | ||
| 16 | KYUNG Erica Missing ID | ||||||
| 17 | JEON Grace | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 18 | WHIPPO Sarah Missing ID | ||||||
| 19 | SLOAN Eleanor | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 20 | DIATTA Lucie Missing ID | ||||||
| 21 | BOBBITT Alexandria | 100% | 82% | 32% | |||
| 22 | DEADMON Gemmia | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | VILLANI Sarah | 100% | 98% | 79% | 33% | ||
| 24 | ARDEN Rebecca Missing ID | ||||||
| 25 | ISBERG Natalie Missing ID | ||||||
| 26 | GOREN Eva | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | ||
| 27 | PRZYBYLO Isabella Missing ID | ||||||
| 28 | GEIGER Abby Missing ID | ||||||
| 29 | BARNES Imani E. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% | ||
| 30 | BUCHLMAYER Alexandra Missing ID | ||||||
| 31 | GONG Shyia (Sophia) Missing ID | ||||||
| 32 | LAPYTSKA Rehina Missing ID | ||||||
| 33 | TSYTSARINA Ekaterina | 100% | 76% | 26% | |||
| 34 | GANESH Varsha | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 35 | FRANKE GORDON Isabella | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% | |
| 36 | JOSEPHSON Shayna | 100% | 84% | 41% | 8% | ||
| 37 | LAROYIA Mira Missing ID | ||||||
| 38 | DAIN Lauren D | 100% | 68% | 18% | |||
| 39 | TIEMANN Rylie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | ENNIS Violet Missing ID | ||||||
| 41 | MAK Emily Missing ID | ||||||
| 42 | POMOGAEVA Veronica Missing ID | ||||||
| 43 | HERRERO Roberta Missing ID | ||||||
| 44 | WRIGHT Jordan Missing ID | ||||||
| 45 | KEITH Margaret | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 46 | OUYANG Wenyi Missing ID | ||||||
| 47 | LEEMAN Amelia Missing ID | ||||||
| 48 | DORR Julia | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 49 | RICHARDSON Faythe-Elonis Missing ID | ||||||
| 50 | NYAM OCHIR Angela Missing ID | ||||||
| 51 | GONSALVES Sharen Missing ID | ||||||
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.