Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG William | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 2 | CHENHE YuHan | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 3 | LAI Yat Hay Casper | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | HU CHIEH-CHI | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 5 | HENSLEY Aaron T. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 6 | WALLER London | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 7 | KINNEY William | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 8 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 9 | SANABRIA Enrique | V V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 10 | JOHNSON Eli | D V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 11 | ZHU Matthew | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 12 | HIBINO Uta | V D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 13 | BOYLAN John R. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 14 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 15 | MONARCH Tom | D D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 16 | WILSON Dawn J. | D V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 17 | FRYMAN Isabel | V D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 18 | BECERRA Karen | V D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 18 | GUTHRIE Andrew | D V V D V D | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
| 20 | MBERIA Alexander | D D V V D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 21 | DUNN Linda J. J. | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 22 | SAWYER Edward | D D V V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 23 | HE Lingyun Matthew | V D D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 24 | SCHWAB Jonah | V V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | HU Andy | V D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 26 | IRWIN Ben | D D V D V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 27 | SCHWAB Zach | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 28 | KAUFFMAN Davian | D D V D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 29 | GREEN Robert | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 30 | LAGUNA Genevieve | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 31 | KILGORE Robert | D V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | JOHNSON Pamela | D D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 33 | MATTERN Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 34 | CONLEY Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.