Vivo Fencing Club - Haverhill, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BRILLANTES Luke | - | - | 4% | 46% | 50% | ||
2 | GATES Combustion | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 28% |
3 | HU Michael | 2% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
4 | BENNETT Emi | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
5 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 6% | < 1% |
6 | GLODE Russell | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% | ||
7 | LI Christina | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 9% | |
8 | SHUTZER Lily | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% | |
9 | ZHILKOV Anya | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
10 | SUN Nathan | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 3% | |
11 | WU Annie | 38% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | ||
12 | BU Ethan | 1% | 14% | 40% | 35% | 10% | ||
13 | SFINTESCU Emma | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
14 | ROSENTHAL Hugh | 9% | 37% | 43% | 11% | - | ||
15 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
16 | HU Weijie | 1% | 12% | 39% | 45% | 3% | ||
17 | HU Daniel | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
18 | NEWTON Zeke | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
19 | FANG Ryan | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
20 | DAVE Neil | 34% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | ||
21 | DAWSON Myer | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
22 | NG Deacon | - | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | ||
23 | JABLOKOV Roman | 20% | 47% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
24 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | ||
25 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
26 | ALIMI Mousa | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | CONNELLY Malcolm | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | ||
29 | ANDERSON Kai | 45% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
30 | KUKLINA Maria | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.