Vivo Fencing Club - Haverhill, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 37% | |
| 2 | DAWSON Myer | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | HU Daniel | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 4 | CONNELLY Malcolm | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% | |
| 5 | NEWTON Zeke | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 6 | ALIMI Mousa | 5% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 7 | JABLOKOV Roman | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 8 | MCCLELLAN Florence | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 10 | NG Deacon | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 11 | KUKLINA Maria | 8% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 12 | FANG Ryan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 13 | ANDERSON Kai | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 13 | DAVE Neil | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.