Culver Academies - Culver, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROMANOV Michael | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | ||
| 2 | OLSON Pel R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 3 | JACOBS Tyler M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 13% | ||
| 3 | ANDERSON David C. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | |||
| 5 | HERGAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 5 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | ||
| 7 | NOVACHENKO Nestor V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | |||
| 8 | LEE Connor C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | ||
| 9 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 100% | 89% | 39% | ||||
| 10 | YI Stephen K. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 11 | PATEL Aryoman M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | ||
| 12 | KIM Aaron | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | ||
| 13 | RICE Jackson (Jack) D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 14 | DANDU Sudhamshu | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | ||
| 15 | VAN BUREN Brett J. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | NOWAK Joseph A. | 100% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 17 | BARLETTA Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% | |
| 18 | SZELA Tom J. | 100% | 79% | 19% | 1% | |||
| 19 | LAWLESS Patrick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
| 20 | COLLINS Liam | 100% | 66% | 16% | ||||
| 21 | SINHA Verdhaan | 100% | 75% | 24% | 3% | < 1% | - | |
| 22 | RYAN Francis D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 11% | ||
| 23 | GLOVER James | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | 8% | ||
| 24 | CORNEJO Theodore B. | 100% | 90% | 46% | 7% | |||
| 25 | LYUTIKOV Yegor | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | 2% | |
| 25 | LIN Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 13% | ||
| 27 | CHAN Arden | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | ||
| 28 | MOSQUET Gaspard | 100% | 96% | 60% | 15% | 1% | ||
| 30 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 31 | PALWAI Sathwik | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 32 | ROBINSON-LEVANT Bryson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 9% | ||
| 33 | UBALDO Ian | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 18% | ||
| 34 | JOHNSON Ric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
| 35 | QUAN Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 11% | |
| 36 | LOUNDY Elan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | 9% | ||
| 37 | KWOK Kyle | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | ||
| 38 | BUERK William T. | 100% | 75% | 15% | ||||
| 39 | LESIMPLE Luke | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | 2% | |
| 40 | MALONE Jesse | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | DOHERTY Matthew | 100% | 93% | 57% | 14% | |||
| 44 | SIVARAJAH Arun | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 50 | YUAN Gavin L. | 100% | 54% | 11% | 1% | - | ||
| 51 | BROT Daniel | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | ||
| 53 | PENNINGTON-FLAX Nigel | 100% | 95% | 75% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 56 | CLARK Riley | 100% | 74% | 25% | 3% | - | ||
| 57 | YONIN Denis | 100% | 94% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | SCHECHTER Nathan L. | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | AAMER Zain | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | |||
| 62 | SHEETS Blake | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 64 | CHAMBERS Cole | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | ||
| 66 | JONES Gabriy'el | 100% | 87% | 50% | 14% | 1% | ||
| 67 | REITS Colby | 100% | 65% | 16% | 1% | |||
| 68 | FITZGERALD Aidan | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | ||
| 70 | BEERS Alexander | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | ||
| 75 | ABBOTT Trevor | 100% | 90% | 44% | 4% | |||
| 77 | HIMMELFARB Daniel | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | ||
| 82 | HARRIS David | 100% | 90% | 50% | 12% | 1% | ||
| 83 | BERGHOFF Asher | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | MCLAUGHLIN Skylar | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.