Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KIM Alison | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
2 | KARLEKAR Ved | - | 9% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% |
3 | SCHWARTZ Sophie | 38% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
3 | PARK Jubin | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% |
5 | LIU Runze | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
6 | SCHWARTZ David | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.