Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SPINA Joseph B. | V V | V V V V | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 2 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | V | V V V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 3 | NGUYEN Tate | V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 3 | DHAL Leon | V V V V | V V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 5 | YANG Zeke | V D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 6 | BOZARTH Alex | V V D | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 7 | BRANNON Nathan | V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 8 | MALEADY Sean | D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 9 | SCHECHTER Noah | V V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 10 | SENECHAL Alexander Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | KTSANES Charles Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | JAMISON Harper | D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 13 | GROOTHUIS David | V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 14 | BALCHAN Adam | D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 15 | CUI Franklin | D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 16 | COHEN Henry Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | DESAI Aadi | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | HARRIS Jacob Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | KASHMIER Ethan | V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 20 | GREENE Patrick | D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 21 | PARKER Joseph Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | KADAKIA Kamraan | D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 23 | MILEN Christopher Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | FOGEL Ethan | D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 25 | WEAVER Brenden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | CLAY Joshua Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | BORUCKI Grant | D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 28 | BECERRA Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | PIFEL Camden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | JURGENS Gus Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | JEON Kaden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | RUSSELL Noah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | ALLEN Ryder Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | BELUE William | D D V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
| 35 | RESNICK Bennett Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | PULTORAK Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | YANG Hongyi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | DENNIS Rodney Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | ROBERTSON Declan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | GREENFIELD David Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | SOSSONG Taso Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | MCKEE Bryce Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | HOUSHOLDER Nolan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | CORNELIUS Arthur Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | STAMPS Caleb Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | WILBERDING Erik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | DRISKILL Cameron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.