Chicago Heights, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ORIATTI-BRUNS Vincent M. | V | V V V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 2 | WAGNER Elijah | V V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 3 | LIM Joshua | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 3 | CHINWAH Kaden | V V V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 5 | WANG Max | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 6 | ZHANG William | V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 7 | OPAKUNLE William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | VEGNA-SPOFFORD Luka Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | MAZZENO Hayden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | SOBOT Eric Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | NORMAN Jackson | D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 12 | LEEDY Martin | V V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 13 | LI Haici Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | AYOOB Zidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | CHANG Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | KARURU Nithin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | GESHELIN Kai Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | SHU Ethan | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 | |
| 19 | HEIMAN Cole Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | SHERIDAN Joseph Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | LAMPE Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | LU Jason Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | LIDDELL Jeirmyri Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | CARTER Hayes Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | BUBACZ Luke Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | HUANG McQueen Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | LAWRENCE Nikolai Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | CARTER Calvin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | EDINBURG Azra Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | STEMO Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | BOBADILLA Gabriel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | STARKS-ROBINSON Matthew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | CHAN Maddon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | PURVIS Thomas | V D D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
| 35 | MCGEE Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | MURPHY Liam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | OKRZYINSKI Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | BHATT Nakshatra Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | MASS Oliver Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | GARRIDO Rafa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | FARKAS Andrew | D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
| 42 | KASTEN AJ Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | STONE Cameron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | FINE Mark Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | BUTLER Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | SHARMA Sohum (Reywa) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | THORNTON Ashton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | ZHOU Albert Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.