Event Results
January FenceathonDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TAN Ryan | D D V D D V | V V V | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 2 | WANG Michael | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | IYER Neil | V V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
| 3 | ZHENIROVSKYY Oleksandr | V D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 5 | ACKERMANN Richard | D V D V D D | D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 6 | LUO Wei | D V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 7 | IRVINE Patrick | D D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |