MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
2 | BROU Inkosi | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 31% | |
3 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | - | - | 6% | 37% | 43% | 13% |
3 | SHOMAN Noah | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
5 | WANG Robert | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
6 | ZHENG Edward L. | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
7 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 36% | 62% |
8 | ZENG Noah | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
9 | DOWNEY Baran | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 19% | |
10 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
11 | FELDMAN Drew | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
12 | DENBROEDER Ronald (Mackie) | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
13 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
14 | ANAND Sahil Z. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
15 | LEMPERT Adam | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
16 | ALLARDYCE Graham | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
17 | SUGIURA Samuel | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
18 | WANG Oscar | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
19 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
20 | MARGULIS Jared | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 46% | 7% | - |
21 | IDRISSI Idris | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
22 | YAO Kevin | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
23 | CLARK Aram | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
24 | KIM Ethan | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
25 | ALLARDYCE Lachlan | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
26 | KWALWASSER Eric | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
27 | ALAVE Kyle | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
28 | HE Bowen | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
29 | MANGAN Daniel Marsh | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
30 | LIU Ryan | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
31 | LI william | 42% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
32 | YANG Kevin | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | GRIMM Benjamin | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
34 | LEE Andrew | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
35 | HAPP Braeden | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
36 | PENG Victor | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
37 | WITCZAK Mateus | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
37 | TIAGI George | 16% | 46% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | LINCOURT Arthur | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
40 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 59% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
41 | FTAIHA Ezra | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | - | - | - |
42 | MATTSON Logan | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
43 | DOSTAL Maximilian | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
43 | LORIN Ike | 10% | 40% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
45 | MILINKOVIC Luka | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
46 | LIU Alexander | 21% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | JUNG Ethan | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.