Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YAP Nathan | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 2 | TRUBETSKI David | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | LACZIN Mark R. | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | BEAR Myles A. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | YU William | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | PARRISH Evan | V V V V V | V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 8 | ZAIDI Adil | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 9 | SHEA William | V V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 10 | WOOD Ben | V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 11 | BLAM Aaron | V V V V D | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | GORDON Rachel A. | V V V D V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 13 | WITTIG Jonathon T. | V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 14 | XU Dinghui Ryan | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | BAYER John P. | D V V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 16 | RUSANOV Oleg | D V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 17 | FADL Omar | D V V V V V | D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 18 | GRAHAM Asa | V V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | XU Joseph | V V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | SEDGLEY Samuel | D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | CANDELARIA Armando | V V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 22 | ZAIDI Sohail | V D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 23 | MOORE Addisyn | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 24 | IHRIE Greg H. | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 25 | DONOHUE Peter | D V D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | MACKAY Ian | D D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 27 | SWANN Max | D D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | GODIN Willis | D D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 29 | NSUBUGA Jeffrey | D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 30 | SELTZER Eve | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | MYERS Kenneth | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | CULP Joshua | D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | CHAO Pierre | D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 34 | NESTERUK Hope | V D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 35 | WESTGATE Rebecca | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 36 | JENKINS Michael | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 36 | BERGMANN Beatrix | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 38 | NAUGHTON Aidan | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 39 | STENSON Alyssa | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.