Junior Olympics

Junior Women's Foil

Friday, February 16, 2024 at 9:00 AM

Charlotte, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LIU Jaelyn A. - - - - 1% 14% 85%
2 KIM Katherine - - - - 4% 29% 68%
3 KONG Chin-Yi - - - - 1% 17% 82%
3 CHO Rebecca H. - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
5 CHEN Jia P. - - - - 1% 13% 87%
6 LIU Joy Zhaoyi - - - - 5% 32% 63%
7 SUN Ruoxi - - - 2% 14% 41% 42%
8 TAN Kaitlyn N. - - - - 3% 29% 68%
9 JANG Kimberley - - - 2% 13% 42% 43%
9 YANG Iris - - - 2% 15% 42% 41%
11 XUE Alanna L. - - - - 3% 27% 71%
12 SHEN Sophia H. - - - - 1% 15% 84%
13 CHUSID Mikayla - - - - 1% 15% 84%
13 EYER Hailey M. - - - - 4% 33% 63%
15 LEE Lavender - - - 1% 8% 37% 54%
16 CHEN Chloe I. - - - 1% 13% 49% 37%
17 GOOR Viviene E. - - - 2% 14% 42% 41%
18 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. - - - - 1% 17% 82%
19 FEDELI Caterina S. - - - - 2% 25% 73%
20 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - - - 7% 36% 57%
21 PEVZNER Victoria - - - - 2% 22% 76%
22 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - - - - 8% 50% 42%
23 LESLIE Ryanne T. - - - - 1% 13% 86%
24 NISSINOFF Alexandra - - - 4% 21% 44% 30%
25 KLINE Melissa C. - - 1% 11% 41% 47%
26 CHEN Renee - - 1% 13% 46% 40%
27 SHEN Lydia - - - - 4% 28% 68%
28 SENIC Adeline - - - - 3% 29% 68%
29 MI Aileen - - - 4% 27% 56% 12%
30 SHENG Chuxi - - 2% 14% 36% 37% 10%
31 SERBAN Samantha M. - - - - 9% 50% 41%
32 MORADI Raiyan N. - 1% 7% 31% 41% 18% 2%
33 GRIFFIN Emma G. - - - - 5% 31% 64%
34 CHEN Allison V. - - - - 5% 31% 64%
35 SAIFEE Lamya - - - 7% 32% 50% 11%
36 LAI Sophia - - 1% 10% 35% 46% 8%
37 DAVIS Bonnie Z. - - - 2% 13% 41% 44%
38 SHEN Emilia - - - 3% 21% 57% 19%
39 FENG Grace - - 2% 14% 41% 38% 5%
40 FUNG Emma - - - 9% 40% 43% 8%
41 KNIGHT Skylar - - - - 3% 26% 71%
42 MCSHERRY Ava - - 5% 23% 41% 26% 5%
43 CHO Emily (Euran) - - 1% 7% 36% 46% 9%
44 SEO IRENE Y. - - - 1% 12% 41% 45%
44 ORVANANOS Anice - - 1% 11% 51% 34% 4%
44 PENG Serena - 2% 18% 38% 31% 10% 1%
47 HUNG Juliana K. - - - - 4% 33% 63%
48 ZHANG Alina C. - - - - 7% 36% 57%
49 DENG Melissa - 3% 16% 34% 33% 12% 1%
50 SHIM Grace J. - - 2% 14% 43% 35% 6%
51 ZHOU Catherine - 1% 6% 24% 40% 24% 4%
52 SHMAY Anastasia - - 2% 14% 38% 41% 5%
53 YANG Emma - 1% 5% 22% 41% 29% 2%
54 LUO Sandra J. - - 1% 8% 32% 44% 14%
55 NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" - - 1% 8% 35% 45% 12%
55 ASCHETTINO Aurora - - 2% 15% 39% 36% 8%
57 FUNG Vera - - 3% 20% 49% 28%
58 KO Claire - 1% 14% 35% 34% 13% 2%
59 BEAVER Hannah - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13% -
60 CANNON Lira J. - - 1% 14% 46% 35% 4%
61 MEI Sarah - 1% 5% 24% 41% 26% 3%
62 RANDOLPH Piper - - - 2% 30% 53% 15%
63 LI Sophia M. - - 3% 20% 45% 28% 4%
64 WANDJI Anais - - 7% 29% 47% 17%
65 HO Brianna W. - - - 5% 41% 55%
66 CALISE Ella - - - 1% 13% 49% 37%
67 KIM Rachel - - 1% 9% 33% 43% 14%
68 DE LA CRUZ Eden - - - 3% 25% 56% 15%
69 WANG CAROL - - 6% 33% 49% 11% 1%
70 ZHENG Julie - - 2% 15% 42% 35% 6%
71 SHA Yi Ling - 2% 14% 36% 35% 12% 1%
71 LENK Sophie - 4% 20% 39% 29% 7% -
73 PEVZNER Nicole - 1% 5% 19% 39% 32% 5%
74 ROZPEDOWSKI Claire - - 5% 27% 42% 22% 3%
75 SUN Chloe - - 1% 9% 45% 41% 4%
76 LEE Fiona E. - 1% 7% 30% 47% 15% 1%
77 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) - - 2% 15% 48% 31% 4%
78 YANG Audrey - - 5% 24% 45% 24% 1%
79 SWANSON Alexa 1% 10% 36% 38% 13% 1%
80 CHEW Alexis T. - - 1% 9% 31% 42% 17%
81 COOPER Piper W. - - 4% 22% 43% 28% 4%
82 HSU Kaylin - - 3% 17% 43% 34% 3%
83 MANIKTALA Prisha - - 1% 11% 37% 42% 9%
83 OH Ceana - 1% 10% 32% 40% 17% 1%
85 XIE Lillian - 1% 8% 34% 44% 13% 1%
86 HAYES Alyssa R. - 1% 8% 32% 41% 16% 1%
87 SUN Emily - - 6% 26% 44% 22% 1%
88 PARK Leah - 2% 12% 37% 36% 12% 1%
89 YAN Noelle - 1% 11% 36% 37% 13% 1%
90 BIODROWICZ Julia - - 4% 20% 39% 30% 6%
91 ROY Layla - - 5% 28% 44% 20% 2%
91 HAN Crystal - 1% 11% 32% 36% 17% 2%
91 REN Kayley - 2% 14% 35% 37% 12% -
94 BASILE Gianna - 3% 21% 46% 27% 4% -
95 ZELDIN Nadia - 5% 21% 37% 29% 8% -
96 CHOW Annabelle - - 4% 19% 39% 31% 8%
96 TAYLOR Gabby 3% 29% 42% 21% 4% - -
98 LI Han (Helina) - 2% 13% 38% 37% 10% -
99 LIU Angel(Daying) - - 1% 10% 46% 40% 4%
100 FIELD Julianna - 1% 10% 34% 43% 12% 1%
101 SHENG Katherine - 5% 24% 43% 24% 4% -
102 KETTELLE Molly - 1% 13% 38% 35% 11% 1%
103 ZHAO Sophie L. - - 1% 13% 57% 30%
104 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia - - 1% 9% 38% 42% 10%
105 HAN Katherine 1% 12% 36% 36% 13% 1% -
106 DAVIS Logan - 1% 8% 30% 40% 19% 3%
107 BABIAC Julia 1% 7% 28% 43% 19% 3% -
107 KAPOOR Saanvi - 3% 18% 41% 31% 7% -
109 BEAVER Ava - 1% 11% 35% 41% 11% 1%
109 SHTEPA Rada 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
111 MU Allison - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13% -
112 SHMUKLER Maria - 3% 23% 49% 23% 2% -
113 PANT Anisha - - 1% 11% 35% 41% 12%
114 ZHANG Ivy 3% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
115 LEVY Avery 1% 11% 35% 36% 14% 2% -
115 LI Eleanor - 1% 8% 29% 40% 20% 2%
117 DO Leila - 1% 6% 24% 41% 24% 4%
118 VO Bao-Vy - 1% 12% 39% 36% 11% 1%
119 RAO Sonia D. - 2% 16% 43% 31% 8% -
120 CHANG Elizabeth - 1% 6% 24% 42% 26% 2%
121 MARISI Gianna 1% 11% 37% 38% 12% 1%
122 KOSTELNY Alexis - - 4% 21% 39% 30% 6%
123 FENG Audrey 5% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
124 MORALES Paulina 2% 20% 47% 26% 5% - -
125 WANG Chloe 1% 7% 29% 39% 20% 4% -
126 QUINN Anna - 13% 41% 37% 8% - -
127 PENG Charlotte 9% 30% 36% 19% 5% - -
128 WANG Yudi 1% 12% 36% 37% 13% 1% -
129 CASTANEDA Keira - - 2% 15% 42% 37% 3%
130 YU Jane 1% 9% 28% 37% 20% 4% -
131 HO Addison - 2% 20% 59% 17% 1%
132 WANG Sophia - 6% 32% 51% 10% 1% -
133 ZHANG Selena - 3% 16% 37% 35% 9% -
134 NEUMAN Sophie 1% 13% 43% 35% 8% 1% -
135 LEE Allison - 1% 12% 38% 37% 11% 1%
136 SHUM Maya - 11% 37% 36% 14% 2% -
137 XIE Su 1% 12% 36% 37% 13% 1% -
138 CHOI Sophie 20% 52% 23% 4% - - -
139 ZHANG Eunice - 1% 8% 30% 40% 19% 2%
140 PUOPOLO Mia 10% 33% 37% 17% 3% - -
141 DONG Emily 1% 16% 52% 27% 4% - -
142 HAO Danica - 3% 20% 41% 29% 7% 1%
143 DIMATULAC Elise Ann 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
144 MALONE Ella 8% 48% 36% 7% - - -
145 CHOI Kailyn 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 3% -
146 CAO Kayla 11% 36% 37% 14% 1% - -
147 ZAMLYNNY Maya 12% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
148 VIJAYAKUMAR Diya 1% 21% 45% 28% 5% - -
149 KENNEDY Elizabeth - 5% 20% 37% 30% 9% -
150 MARTIRE Alessandra 4% 25% 41% 24% 6% - -
151 HAFEZ Tahiyah - 6% 34% 44% 15% 1%
152 PEDERSEN Clara 49% 43% 8% - - -
153 BASSIK Eva 1% 9% 40% 39% 11% 1%
154 COLLINS Anna 26% 48% 22% 4% - -
155 SHAH Suhani 8% 39% 44% 8% - -
156 STRUGAR Steliana - 2% 13% 33% 36% 15% 1%
157 BABER Eshaal 6% 34% 43% 16% 2% - -
157 GREEN Marisa - 7% 34% 43% 14% 2% -
159 NIRGUDE Siddhi 2% 20% 43% 29% 6% - -
160 GOLLNICK Mira 1% 13% 40% 34% 11% 1% -
161 HOBSON Ava - 5% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
162 LUH Mia P. - 5% 24% 40% 25% 5% -
163 SULTER Aurelie 1% 12% 37% 37% 12% 1% -
163 STONE Sydney 1% 17% 48% 29% 5% - -
165 GUAN Adeline - 2% 23% 51% 21% 3% -
165 TAYLOR-OSBORN Nadia 22% 47% 26% 5% - - -
167 CAMPBELL June 11% 38% 38% 11% 1% - -
168 LIN Ju-An Adrianne 1% 10% 31% 36% 18% 3% -
169 KIM Claire 7% 40% 39% 13% 1% - -
170 WEBB Ella - - 6% 25% 40% 24% 4%
171 ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% - -
172 OWENS Elise 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% - -
172 CHENG Isa 9% 35% 40% 15% 2% - -
174 POEI Lauren 3% 22% 43% 26% 6% - -
175 MIRZA Sophia 15% 44% 32% 8% 1% - -
176 HOOGSTRA Lucy 4% 31% 46% 17% 2% - -
177 LEMASTERS Elise M. 37% 45% 15% 2% - - -
177 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol 6% 27% 41% 23% 3% - -
179 LIU Emily 30% 50% 18% 2% - - -
180 URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia 19% 42% 30% 8% 1% - -
181 WANG Celine S. 1% 10% 35% 40% 13% 1% -
182 ALKADI Mai 8% 35% 41% 14% 2% - -
183 DANIELYANTS Gabriela 2% 15% 35% 33% 13% 2% -
183 GUO Audrey 12% 39% 35% 12% 2% - -
185 SHICK Veronika 2% 31% 44% 20% 3% - -
186 KANG Marian 16% 56% 24% 4% - - -
187 LIU Elinda 9% 48% 34% 8% 1% - -
188 BUDKO Julia 13% 47% 35% 5% - -
189 MCKAY Teresa 7% 30% 40% 20% 2% - -
190 HOVAGHIMIAN Fira 22% 43% 28% 7% 1% - -
190 YIM Rachael 3% 26% 48% 20% 3% - -
190 JACOB Norah 38% 50% 11% 1% - - -
193 NAIR Supriya 3% 21% 40% 28% 8% 1% -
193 LI Grace 5% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
195 LIU Long 14% 41% 35% 9% 1% - -
196 DESAI Esha 6% 32% 40% 18% 3% - -
196 WU Chingfei Amber 16% 40% 32% 10% 1% - -
198 LYON Claire 8% 52% 33% 6% - - -
199 LIU Grace 8% 39% 40% 12% 1% - -
200 HARROLD Sophia 18% 42% 31% 8% 1% - -
201 SWOPE Farren 14% 45% 32% 8% 1% - -
202 GREENLEAF Ella 16% 39% 32% 11% 2% - -
202 MARISTANY Marbella 49% 40% 10% 1% - - -
204 WYATT Stella 14% 42% 34% 8% 1% - -
205 MONAGHAN Claire (Micah) 18% 53% 25% 4% - - -
206 MCDERMOTT Catherine 49% 40% 10% 1% - - -
207 SINGH Sania 69% 28% 3% - - - -
207 LAY Apollonia 5% 47% 36% 10% 1% - -
209 MULLER Van 32% 53% 14% 1% - - -
209 CHANG Janelle 56% 38% 6% - - - -
211 GOEL Riyana 23% 46% 25% 5% - - -
211 ISHANOVA Sofia 3% 23% 50% 21% 2% - -
213 MA Emily(Yiming) 56% 37% 6% - - - -
213 LAYE Isabella 3% 21% 43% 26% 6% - -
215 LAU Elena 65% 31% 4% - - - -
216 ARMSTRONG Olivia 2% 19% 41% 30% 7% - -
217 LAO Sophia 1% 13% 42% 33% 10% 1% -
218 BLAKEY Heaven 37% 46% 16% 2% - -
219 WISEMAN Margaret (Daisy) 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
220 ALVAREZ Isabella 55% 38% 7% - - -
221 CHUNG Chloe 27% 45% 23% 4% - - -
222 UHRICH Reese 39% 47% 14% 1% - - -
222 LOWTHER Imogen 14% 45% 32% 8% 1% - -
222 GADIYARAM Sushama 24% 43% 27% 6% - - -
222 OLSON Ingrid 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% - -
226 SNYDERS Evelyn 32% 44% 20% 4% - - -
226 VILLALOBOS Ava 53% 37% 9% 1% - - -
228 LENZ Zoe N. 1% 11% 36% 37% 14% 2% -
228 NIRGUDE Esha 35% 45% 18% 2% - - -
228 LAWRENCE Nia 7% 44% 40% 9% 1% - -
228 MALVESTUTO Evelyn 72% 25% 3% - - - -
232 SHIN Jaelynn 28% 54% 16% 2% - -
233 MARKERT Delaney 48% 44% 7% - - - -
233 SOHN Juniper 72% 25% 2% - - - -
233 KRAATZ Kira 82% 17% 1% - - - -
236 WANG Kelsey 88% 11% - - - - -
237 HIMMEL Alexandra 41% 44% 14% 1% - - -
237 KIEFER Priti 71% 26% 3% - - - -
239 RYDMAN Grace 53% 38% 8% 1% - - -
239 VERGARA Jaden Reese 35% 43% 18% 4% - - -
239 LEVANT Briea 22% 41% 28% 8% 1% - -
239 MCDANIEL Laila 39% 45% 15% 2% - - -
243 ZAHALSKY Abigail 9% 33% 39% 16% 3% - -
244 JACOBSEN Katerina 32% 47% 18% 2% - - -
244 LEE Allison 64% 31% 5% - - - -
244 MAHESH Sehar 13% 34% 34% 15% 3% - -
247 SEO odelia 44% 41% 13% 2% - - -
248 GUILLETTE Hazel 59% 35% 6% - - - -
248 MARTIN Emma 78% 20% 1% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.