Music City Fencing Club - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | UPTON Craig | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 36% | 4% | |
| 2 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 5% | |
| 3 | PALMAFFY Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
| 3 | LIM Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% |
| 5 | LEYLAND John | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 6 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 7 | CURTIS William K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 8 | COVER Harrison | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
| 9 | BATSON Kaleookalani J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | PIRAINO Robert C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% | |
| 11 | PANTIN Dominique L. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | BAKER Julian L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 13 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | - |
| 14 | LIM Joshua | 100% | 99% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | EDWARDS Darby | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | JONES Nate | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 4% | |
| 17 | COLLUM Thomas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 18 | SUERSTEDT Haydn | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | PALMAFFY Sophia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | LIM Joel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
| 21 | AMMON Blue | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 3% | |
| 22 | PALMAFFY Duncan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 23 | GRAY Martha R. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | USELTON Kaden | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | BURT Stephen | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 26 | BRAINERD Jim | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 27 | GIRGIS Isaiah | 100% | 96% | 67% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | TUGGY Candise | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | GUKASOVA Anastasia | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | SORRELLS Brea | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | GUHA Maya | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LANDMAN Charlotte | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.