Nazlymov Fencing - Washington, DC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ||
| 1 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 13% |
| 2 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 3 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | - | - | 4% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 3 | FENG Leo | - | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 5 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | - | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 6 | FENKER William M. | - | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 7 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 8 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | BUKOWSKI Todd | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 10 | BAKER Keith L. | - | 1% | 4% | 14% | 28% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 11 | LEE Justin | - | 1% | 6% | 18% | 30% | 27% | 14% | 4% | - |
| 12 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 6% | 32% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 13 | ELDER John | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 14 | NEWMAN Jack | 2% | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | BUKOWSKI Broghan J. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | GAUVEY Ken C. | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 17 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 29% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 18 | MEYTIN Maxwell S. | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.