Event Results
February FenceathonDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XU Ethan | V V D V V | V V V | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 2 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | DUFF Michael | V V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 3 | DUFF Caitlin | D V D V V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 5 | CHEN Sean | V V D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 6 | LUO Gavin | V D V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 7 | HULL Brandtley | D V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 8 | WANG James | D V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 9 | LIN Rongxuan | D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 10 | MILLIKAN Aaron | D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 11 | CHEN Yihan | D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 12 | YANG Renee | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |