Modern Duelists Fencing Academy - Elkton, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 2 | CHAWLA Aarav | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 3 | SUN Ethan | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 3 | ALEXANDER Jacksen | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 5 | BANNEN Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 45% | 11% |
| 6 | MARTINEZ Joshua | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 7 | KAPLAN Maddox | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 8 | TATE William Isom | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 9 | WATERS Nathaniel | 1% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 10 | EVANS George | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | KARASICK Andrew | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | KORMANN Joseph | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 29% | 4% |
| 13 | CUCCIARRE Pace | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 14 | CUMMINGS Owen | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 15 | KIM Zac | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 16 | ALBERTSON Tory | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | CZACHOROWSKI Mark | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 18 | WOOD William A. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
| 19 | HUTZ Michael B. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 20 | SOKALSKI Edwin | 1% | 13% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | |
| 21 | MURPHY Megan | 4% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 22 | WISCHNIA Eric | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | WOHNER Kenneth S. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHEN Shanshan | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 25 | DEXTER Danny | 2% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | LUNNING Karen | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.