Peoria Academy School - Peoria, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 15% |
| 2 | HICKEY Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
| 3 | NI Aaric | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 3 | FRASER Rhys | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 5 | ZHOU Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 20% |
| 6 | WENGER Liam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 7 | HONG Derek | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 8 | ZMUDA Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% | |
| 9 | BALES Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 10 | DEPP Edward | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 6% |
| 11 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
| 12 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
| 13 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 14 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 15 | SYMMANK Callen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | TURNER Jackson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 17 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 18 | YOUNG Jack | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 19 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 20 | XU Rambert | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | WENGER Rowan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 22 | MCMILLIAN Harrison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 23 | DAVIS Benjamin | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 24 | MURPHY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 25 | CHASE Crosby | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 26 | TAGORE Reyansh | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | GREULICH Nikolas | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 28 | ZHENG Lerui | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | CHEN Varick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% |
| 30 | HASTINGS Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | DIFRANK Tae | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | BLACK John | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | NG Gavin | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | LI Andy | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 35 | FRASER Alistair | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | ZHANG Hanson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 37 | CHAN William | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CRONK Trevor | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | KOPELMAN Henry | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | MCGRATH Milo | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | TAGORE Ayansh | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.