Salle Auriol Seattle - Seattle, WA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MORENO BRIONES Patricio A. | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 98% |
2 | CAMERON Matt W. | - | - | - | 3% | 49% | 48% | |
3 | KOEHN Ted | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% | |
3 | FLANAGAN James | - | - | 4% | 27% | 55% | 14% | |
5 | VALENTINE Iain | - | - | 2% | 17% | 50% | 30% | - |
6 | TANG Julian | - | - | - | 3% | 51% | 46% | |
7 | ESTELL Oscar M. | - | - | - | 5% | 42% | 53% | |
8 | POWERS Douglas A. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 45% | 40% | - |
9 | WU Jingxiao | - | 4% | 27% | 53% | 14% | 1% | |
10 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | - | 1% | 14% | 55% | 30% | |
11 | KRYLTSOV Greg | - | 4% | 30% | 60% | 6% | - | |
12 | GELLER Alan S. | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
13 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 1% | 23% | 53% | 21% | 2% | - | |
14 | REED David | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
15 | HOLCOMB Michael | 38% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
16 | MONES Robert (Bob) J. | 3% | 27% | 53% | 17% | - | - | |
17 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | - | 8% | 37% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
18 | HUESKE David B. | 5% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
19 | AMMAR Sam | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
20 | ALLAN Peter L. | 2% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 7% | - | - |
21 | LISONDRA Jay | 9% | 37% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
22 | WALTERS John | 34% | 48% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
23 | TEARSE Robert G. | 11% | 52% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
24 | VAN STEIN Thomas | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 5% | - | |
25 | KLEINMAN Joseph | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.