Oregon Convention Center - Portland, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUO Ziyue | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
2 | LIN Zhi Tong | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 53% |
3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
3 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
5 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
6 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
7 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
8 | ZHANG Eunice | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 34% | 5% |
9 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 52% | 29% |
10 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
11 | WANG CAROL | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
12 | FENG Grace | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
13 | MI Aileen | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
14 | KIM Rachel | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 58% | 26% |
15 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
16 | SHENG Chuxi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
17 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 34% | 5% |
18 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
19 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% |
20 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
21 | PENG Serena | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
22 | HARRIS Julia | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
23 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 6% |
24 | YANG Emma | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
25 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 48% | 13% |
26 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
27 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 6% |
28 | OH Ceana | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 3% |
29 | LEUNG Mei Hang (Danise) | - | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 35% | |
30 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 20% |
31 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
32 | SHIM Grace J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
33 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | - | - | 3% | 37% | 60% |
34 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% |
35 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 25% | |
36 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
37 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
38 | XIE Lillian | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 1% |
39 | ZHANG Junyi Irina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
40 | SUN Emily | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 19% |
41 | GU Maggie Runlin | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 31% |
42 | LI Alice | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
43 | FETECAU Ilinca | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
44 | JOO Natalie | 1% | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
45 | LI Han (Helina) | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
46 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 11% |
47 | BAE Yooju | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 15% | 1% |
48 | YONG Rosalind | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
49 | KIM Claire | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
51 | WANG SIQI | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 3% |
52 | YANG Audrey | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
53 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
54 | GUO Audrey | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
55 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 4% |
56 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
57 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% | |
58 | XIE Su | 4% | 24% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | |
59 | WYNN Kylie | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
60 | STRUGAR Steliana | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 4% |
61 | ZOLDAN Gweniveve A. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
62 | LENK Sophie | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
63 | KO Claire | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 25% | 3% |
64 | DONG Angela | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
65 | HAN Crystal | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
66 | HO Addison | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 6% |
67 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 42% | 17% | |
68 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
69 | WU Nicole Moxuan | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
70 | ZHANG Ivy | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 43% | 15% | 1% |
71 | HU Jenna | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
72 | ZHUANG Christina | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 11% |
73 | BEAVER Ava | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
74 | ZHANG Lian | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
75 | POEI Lauren | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 3% | - |
76 | DAVIS Logan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 32% | 3% |
77 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
78 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | - | 5% | 26% | 46% | 22% | |
79 | LAI Sophia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% |
80 | SIROTA Francis | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
81 | ZHENG Zoe | 1% | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
82 | WANG Amabel | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
83 | REN Kayley | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 16% | 1% |
84 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
85 | BERGEL Daphne | - | 5% | 28% | 43% | 21% | 2% | - |
86 | URDANETA LARGURA Sylvia | 1% | 14% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
86 | LI Azalea | 4% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
88 | LIU Enjia sherry | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 4% |
89 | CHUN Adelle Ha-Eune | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
89 | JIANG Chloe | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
91 | MU Allison | - | - | 4% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 4% |
92 | ORRINGER Lottie | 6% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
93 | PENG Charlotte | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
93 | BING Charlotte | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
93 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
96 | LIU Samantha | 3% | 21% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
97 | CAI Ilana | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
98 | ANDONIAN Lauren | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
98 | DESAI Esha | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
100 | FAN Lydia | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
101 | CUI alivia | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - |
102 | PIERSON Sophie | 11% | 39% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
103 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
104 | WANG Sophia | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
105 | MCFARLANE Asha | 3% | 21% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
106 | LIU Eva | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
107 | BROWN Lola | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
107 | GUAN Adeline | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
109 | SAKALLA Serene | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
110 | KRAHE Annika | - | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - |
111 | BOLES Amanda X. | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 2% |
111 | YAN Noelle | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
111 | FENG Audrey | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
114 | ZONG Melody | 17% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
115 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
116 | TAO Ann | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
117 | NAIR Supriya | 3% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
117 | AADHI Hansika | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
119 | WU Chingfei Amber | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
120 | DESERANNO Seren | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
121 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
122 | LUO Miranda | 22% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
123 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | < 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
124 | MONAT Jennifer | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
125 | COX Sophia | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
126 | HUGHES Olivia | 21% | 48% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
127 | CHERNYKH Elina | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
127 | AL-BATTAINEH Eva | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
129 | HAN Gian | - | 7% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% | - |
130 | CASHMAN Hailey | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
131 | LEVESQUE Brielle | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
132 | PAN Yiran | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
133 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | 36% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
134 | REZA Fukaina | 36% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
135 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
136 | MIRZA Sophia | 7% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
137 | YU Jane | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
137 | SHIN Jaelynn | 17% | 48% | 29% | 6% | - | - | - |
139 | CHU Felicity | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
140 | WANG DINA C. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
141 | SAH Madeleine | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
142 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | < 1% | 3% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
143 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
144 | LIU Emily | 6% | 49% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
144 | CHANG Janelle | 38% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
146 | LI Savannah | 14% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
146 | AL-BATTAINEH Hana | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
148 | LIN Allison | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
149 | PEDERSEN Haley | 19% | 47% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
150 | ZHOU Nichole | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
151 | PIQUETTE Annika | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
151 | VANMOORSEL Faye | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
153 | LIU Ariana | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
154 | KIM Sydney | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
155 | WANG Yiru (Nina) | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
156 | WILLIAMSON Tessa | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
157 | YUEN Chloe | 18% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
158 | TAN Shouyin | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
159 | ZHOU Joi | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
160 | LEUNG Lokhei (Hailey) | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
161 | LIU Grace | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
162 | WANG Melissa | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
163 | NIRGUDE Esha | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
164 | GUO GABRINA | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
165 | MORSE Katherine | 13% | 54% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
166 | WU Elynna | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
167 | YUEN Elsie | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
168 | MA Emily(Yiming) | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
169 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | |
170 | CLAYTON Evelyn | 79% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
171 | HILLMAN Eris | 8% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
172 | ASADI Lucille | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.