Woodbridge JCC - Woodbridge, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Jenny Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | GAO Zhuning Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | WEED Addi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | MCDERMOTT Catherine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 5 | ZHOU Olivia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | KYIJONG Tenzin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 7 | LURIX Elise Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | WILES Maeve Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | MORRISSEY Sara Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | RODES Abigail Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 11 | PANNONE Elisa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | HAQUE Isabela | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | BELLISTRI Isabella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | NETTLETON Ava Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | WILLEY Maggie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | CERASOLI Emily Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | TAYLOR Jayla Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | RYAN Shay Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | GREENLEAF Ella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | DOWNING Marlena Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | FLORES-AGUILAR Stephanie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | MOFFAT Hanako Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | WHITNEY Annabelle Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | AL-TAMEEMI Qamar Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | YU Hannah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | NICOLAS Pia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | LIAO Jiarou (J.O.) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | SARCOZZI Annabella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | GERST Taylor Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | O'BRIEN Meredith Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | ZHANG Dorothy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | DEANE Allison Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | ZAKARIA Sadeya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | RAMOS Barbara Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | GALARNEAU Charlotte Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | YU Michelle Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | CHOW Desiree Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | CHAMBLESS Janelle Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | MCCARTNEY Chloe Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | HU-VOONG Isabella Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | ISAAC Nakayla Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | WOLLMAR Annie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | LAVINE Sam Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | TSEPHEL Tenzin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | HAYNES Alicia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | SATO Saki Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | HAGAN Sarah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | NAQVI Emaan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | DUTRA Eleese Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | CAO Christina Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | KELLY Natalie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | RUGGIERO Jessica Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.