Woodbridge JCC - Woodbridge, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | BROOKHART Elaina Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | SIU Maple | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 | |
| 3 | GU Emily Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | SIU Hazel | V | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 5 | SLOSSBERG Eva Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | ZHANG Flora | D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 7 | SIVRI Ayla Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 8 | PELILLO Devyn Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | MORADA Addy Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | KISSINGER Tessa | V | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 11 | HOMME Kalla Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | GIELEGHEM Klaire Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | HANSARD Anna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | ZHOU Nikky Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | LI Rebecca Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | HALL Henrietta Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | MORGAN Emmylou Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 18 | DARMAWAN Tishia | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | STOTZ Norah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | CHAUDHARI Tejal Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | ANDERSON Madeline Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | MOON Veronica Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | MCKENZIE Melinda Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | ROMANENKO Kate Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | STRUNJO Alessa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | GERBOTH Lauren Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 27 | CARON Josie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 28 | CLARK Amelia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | TAKYAR Arianna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | ANWER Sana Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | VICTOR Chanel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | GERSZ Gavin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | BASU Avneete Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | LENSCHOW Sophie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | CARNEY Amelia | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | WALKER Sadie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | JOHNSON Maia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | CUMMINS Ava Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | STARKOVA Alisa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | EDWARDS Chyanne Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | RIVERA Jayden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | MARASHI Edmira Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | GAO Fiona Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | GREGOIRE Elizaveta Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | BIRCH Laurel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | BODIAN Tabby Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | DOBOE Sydney Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 48 | WEBER Kylie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 49 | CARDENAS Maria Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 50 | JEZNACH Carly Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 51 | KATIRA Mahak Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 52 | DORSEY Piper Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 53 | ALLA Aleah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 54 | SUTHERLAND Alanna Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 55 | CHEN Yoyee Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 56 | SHARIFF Fiza Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 57 | HUDGENS Olivia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 58 | SHIRLEY Cheyenne Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 59 | CATALA Elizabeth Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 60 | JOERCHEL Natalie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 61 | WATERMAN Alyssa Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.