Hooked on Fencing - North Royalton, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ARLINGTON Nicholas J. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 43% |
2 | POHL Merik A. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
3 | MARSHALL John W. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 28% | |
3 | STEELE DeMario A. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 30% | |
5 | MICKO Fritz K. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 23% |
6 | MASON Zander T. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
7 | CAMP Ethan | 6% | 33% | 44% | 16% | 1% | - | |
8 | LASIYCHUK Nikita | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
9 | EVERT Todd | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
10 | JONES Reilly | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - |
11 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
12 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
13 | CAVRELL Nicholas | - | 8% | 35% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
14 | CHO Joseph | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
15 | ZHANG Michael | 9% | 41% | 41% | 9% | - | - | |
16 | WANG Kaiyan | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
17 | TAQI Ahmad F. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
18 | ZHANG James | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
19 | WHITE Scott | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
20 | BONILHA-VAN'T HOF Rafael | 9% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
21 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
22 | MCCOY Lauren | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
23 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
24 | LEHMAN Matthew | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
25 | BHARADWAJ Aadhav | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
26 | BOLCEVIC Sherri | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.