Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HWANG Brandon | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
2 | RAVI Arjun | D V V V V D | V V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | MARSHALL Wesley | D V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.5 | 4 | -1.5 |
3 | ROCKWELL Nolan | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
5 | LEE Aaron | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
6 | KUCIA Michael J. | D D V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
7 | FERRARA Milo | V D V V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
8 | HUGHES Eric | V D D D V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 3 | -2.2 |
9 | BERNSTEIN Stuart E. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
10 | KRIEGER Jack | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 6 | +2.9 |
10 | JEONG Arisu | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
12 | FORD Tillman | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
13 | HWANG Aidan | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
14 | KIM Daniel | V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
15 | PETE Landon | D V V V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
16 | LU Ethan | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
17 | PAYNE Gareth | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
18 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
19 | ZHOU alex | V V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | TURK Reggie | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
21 | CARRIE Konnor | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
22 | PARK Andrew | V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
23 | KIM Sangone | V V V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
24 | JAAFAR Hamza | V V D V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
25 | MUNAGAPATI Vishwa | D V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
26 | WRIGHT Alex | D V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
27 | LEE Christopher | V D V D V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
28 | WANDMACHER GUERRERO Angela | V V D V D D | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | LIANG Jacob | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
30 | HAWKINS Sophia | D D D D V V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
31 | RAMIREZ Michael | D V V D D D | V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
32 | PAKULATH Nihal | D D D V D D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
33 | LIU Elinda | V V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
34 | ILENRE Roni | V V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
35 | OTERO Ethan | V V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
36 | CORLEY Avery | V D V V V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
37 | REDDY Daksh | D V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
38 | YANG Maximus | V D D V V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
39 | SEATON Jake | V D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
40 | KARRIEM Zainuddin | V D D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
41 | TAK Jemi | D V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
42 | BASKIN Julia | V D D V V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
43 | ATON Dave | D V V D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
44 | DEMAREE Adam | V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
45 | BONNER Cohen | D V D V D V | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
46 | BOLLE Elijah | D V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
47 | TUCKER Evan | D V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
48 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | V V V D D D | V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
49 | LEE Winston | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
50 | MCFARLAND John G. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
51 | OLSON Clayton M. | D D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
52 | HARTIGAN Joe | D V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
53 | CHOI Benjamin | V V D D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
54 | ZIELINSKI Alexander E. | V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
55 | FRAGER Soleil | D V V D D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
56 | DANDRIDGE Laila | D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
57 | WILLIAMS Eli | D V D V D D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
58 | ELEY Ellis | D V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
59 | DUNKLIN Devon | D D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
60 | JIANG Harry | D D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
61 | DOUGLAS John | D V D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
62 | BARRETT John | D D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
63 | HAYES Zackery | V D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
64 | DAVIS Shanna | D D V D D D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
65 | IYER Arjun | V V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
66 | PIERCE Chandon | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
67 | ANDERSON Pierson | D V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
68 | RIGSBEE Rachel | D V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
69 | BELL Adam | D V D D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
70 | FRATTA Caterina | D D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
71 | MIHILL Margaret | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
72 | ARMES Maggie | V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
73 | CHAVEZ Leontine | V D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
74 | AGUILLON Alexis | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
75 | SANCHEZ Jordan | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
76 | FORD Mattie | D D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
77 | SHADOFF Samantha | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
78 | SHAKULA Matvey | V D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
79 | KNOX Aidan | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
80 | STEWART Sarah | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
81 | BARRETT John | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
82 | DOSS matthew | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
83 | TYMOFIEIEVA Arina | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
84 | KARTHIKEYAKANNAN Madhav | D D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 0 | -2.9 |
85 | WATKINS Robert | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
86 | AGEE Brendon | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
86 | VALENZUELA Elijah | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
88 | LEWIS Katherine | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.