Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LI Alice | V V V D D V | V V V V V V | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 2 | BISONO Valentina | V V V V D | V V V V V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 3 | LI Caroline | V D V V V | V V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 3 | JIANG Serena | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 5 | LOBANOVA Varvara | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 6 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | GANSER Nicole | V V V D D | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 8 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 9 | ZHANG Michelle | V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 10 | WANG Sophie Y. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | TAM Connie | V V V D V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 12 | MA Sophie | V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | VOSKOV Olivia | V V V D V | V V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
| 14 | YU Eva | V D D V V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | LI Azalea | D V V D D D | V V D | 4.8 | 2 | -2.8 |
| 16 | GOLIYAD Lisa | D D V V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | WONG Sydney | V V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 18 | CHEN Alina | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | WANG Cecilia | V V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 20 | PETROFF Eva | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 21 | BOROTKO Katerina | V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 22 | ZHU Una | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | GEFFNER Olivia | D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 25 | DHAIYA Tanya | V D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | XIAO Katelyn | D D V V V D | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 27 | ABRAGAN Isabel Grace | V D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 28 | ZHANG Jane | D D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 29 | WANG Selina | D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | BI Michelle | D V D D D D | V D | 4.3 | 1 | -3.3 |
| 31 | JOHN Hannah | D D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 32 | SHABBIR Aiza | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 33 | JU Jennifer | V V D V D V | D | 1.2 | 4 | +2.8 |
| 34 | LENSCHOW Carla | D V D V V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 35 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | D V D V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 36 | WANG Chloe | V D V D D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 37 | HARBES Emma | D V V D V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 38 | SHETH Anayaà | V D D V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 39 | XU Mulan | V V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 40 | KAMENSKY Elina | D D D V V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 41 | KOUAME Candice | D D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 42 | ZHENG Erin | D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 43 | PAN Angela | D D D D V | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 44 | FUNATOMI Maya | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 45 | CHEN Dian | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 46 | ORDORICA Abra | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 47 | PINCHUK Yael | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 48 | GORTI Aadya | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 49 | YANG Eleanor | D D D D D D | D | 3.3 | 0 | -3.3 |
| 50 | CHEN Allison | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 51 | KHANNA Bhairavi | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 52 | LEE Hannah | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.