Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANG Alisa | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 2 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
| 3 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
| 3 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 5 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% | |
| 6 | LI Fei | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 7 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
| 8 | KAUR Manroop | 2% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 9 | SEREGIN Katya | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
| 11 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 46% | 18% | |
| 12 | YOU Emily | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 19% | |
| 13 | CHATIKHINE Anastasia | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% |
| 15 | YOU Isabel B. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | QI Julieanne | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 17 | WANG Sophie Y. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 18 | COLELLA Lauren | 3% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 19 | LI Azalea | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 20 | PARSONS Mischa | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 4% | |
| 21 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | TRAN Helena | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
| 23 | HE Lizbeth | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | WANG Trinity | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 25 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% | |
| 26 | BI Michelle | 8% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | BASRALIAN Azniv | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 8% | |
| 28 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 29 | KRAJA Emma | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | MISHIMA Audrey | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 3% | |
| 30 | PHELAN Gabrielle | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | ZHENG Linden | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 33 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | MEYER Rachel | 5% | 35% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | CHANG Chloe | 3% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 36 | CHEN Alicia | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | PAN Angela | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | RASO Olivia | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
| 40 | WROBEL Julia | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | SHU Youshan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% | |
| 42 | YU Eva | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | FANG Kayla | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | WILLIAMSON Beatrix | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | MEYER Rebecca | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HO Gillian | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | NGUYEN Celena | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | TRAN Katherine | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | HOM Justina | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | SHANKERDAS Shreeya | 1% | 12% | 34% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
| 51 | LI Yixin Catherine | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | GEFFNER Olivia | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | LEEB Zoe | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ALVAREZ Martine | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | BEJUGAMA Lasya | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHANG Cadence | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | KIM Lilian | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.