Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 2 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% |
| 3 | DODIN Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% |
| 3 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 5 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
| 6 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 7 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
| 8 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 23% |
| 9 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 10 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | GIORDANO Zach | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | NG Nico | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
| 16 | YU David | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | WITHERELL Logan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 18 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 19 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 23% | 4% |
| 21 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 23 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | TOPRANI Valmik | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 26 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 27 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
| 28 | PUTHOFF Henry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 29 | DANILOV Artur | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | 2% |
| 30 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% |
| 34 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 37 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 39 | DAI Jason | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 83% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HONG Ethen | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | DINIC Pavle | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | CHIANG William | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 46 | LEE Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 3% |
| 47 | WU Matthew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 48 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 76% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | LANDMAN Martin | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 51 | DAVIS Zane | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 52 | KHAHAM Samuel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 53 | WHITE Leonardo | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | KIM Louie | 100% | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | SHI Evan | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.