Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SONG Angela | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 36% | 56% |
| 2 | PRESMAN Aerin | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
| 3 | WANG Sophie Y. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 3 | YANG Alisa | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 5 | JIANG Serena | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 14% |
| 6 | GANSER Nicole | 3% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 7 | LI Fei | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 8 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | GUJJA Misha | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 10 | WANG Zoe | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% | |
| 11 | ZHANG Michelle | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 33% | |
| 12 | CHEN Alicia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 13 | SU Evelyn | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 43% | 12% |
| 14 | WANG Chloe | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 15 | SHU Youshan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 16 | WU Michelle | 1% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 17 | LI Azalea | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 6% | 26% | 46% | 23% | |
| 19 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | LI Caroline | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 21 | LI Alice | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
| 22 | BISONO Valentina | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | MA Sophie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 24 | DHAIYA Tanya | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | REKEDA Anna | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% | |
| 26 | MONOVA Lilyana | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 26 | TRAN Katherine | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | SHEFFIELD Skye | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 29 | HOM Justina | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TAM Connie | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | COLLOPY Kaia | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | AGAON Evelyn | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | - |
| 33 | YU Eva | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | LI Yixin Catherine | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | HE Lizbeth | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WANG Cecilia | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHANG Chloe | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 38 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% | |
| 39 | LOBANOVA Varvara | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | SEREGIN Katya | 1% | 9% | 31% | 40% | 17% | 2% | |
| 41 | PAN Angela | 4% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | HO Gillian | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | BEICKE Katelyn | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 44 | CHEN Alina | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | WROBEL Julia | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 47 | KUPTSOVA Sofia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | MATHEW Noe | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | KHAHAM Daniela | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | ALVAREZ Martine | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | KWON Elise | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.