Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Joanna | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | BING Charlotte | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 3 | JIANG Chloe | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 3 | LIU Eva | - | - | 2% | 19% | 55% | 23% | |
| 5 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% | |
| 6 | JOO Natalie | - | - | - | 6% | 39% | 54% | |
| 7 | TSIMIKLIS Aphrodite | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% | |
| 8 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% | |
| 9 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 10 | SHIN Elizabeth | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 11 | DONG Angela | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 12 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 4% |
| 12 | WANG Amabel | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 14 | SHENG Katherine | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 15 | BO Iris | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 17 | POLING Katherine | - | 9% | 40% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 18 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% |
| 19 | MCSHERRY Kayla | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 20 | PUTHOFF Olivia | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 3% |
| 21 | FENG Audrey | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 41% | 10% | |
| 22 | KRAHE Annika | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 23 | ORBE-AUSTIN Nia | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 1% | |
| 24 | CAVANAGH Emma | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | HUANG Sophie | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 26 | KIM Claire | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
| 27 | BRADSHAW Tamira | 4% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 28 | DONG Iris | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 33% | 5% |
| 29 | CHEN Sophie | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | |
| 30 | LIN Yunong | - | 5% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | |
| 31 | ORBÉ-AUSTIN Maya | - | 2% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 32 | MANGLANI Maya | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | LEO Jenna | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | REZA Fukaina | 2% | 17% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | CHOI Cara | 24% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | SHANG Arianna | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | EPSTEIN Naomi | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 38 | KANG Annabella | 19% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 39 | LEE Allison | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | PEVZNER Sophia | 27% | 56% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | SHUTZER Lily | 1% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | PEDERSEN Clara | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | BERTOLINI Mia | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | NICUDEMUS Bryella | 1% | 10% | 36% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | LI Savannah | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 8% | |
| 46 | FEDER Acadia | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | KIM Claire | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 48 | DINAR Julia | 13% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | GOODMAN Carden | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | WAN Celine | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | YOUM Amelia | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | JUNCADELLA Lucy | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 53 | KOESTERS Florentine | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | GOMEZ Sofia | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | OTTAVIANO Maris | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | ZHANG Caroline | 36% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | ROSS Stella | 55% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.